Literature DB >> 11447593

Fundamental differences between the thalamocortical recipient layers of the cat auditory and visual cortices.

P H Smith1, L C Populin.   

Abstract

In visual and somatosensory cortices of several species, spiny stellate cells in layer 4 are the first elements in signal processing where thalamic information is integrated and emergent receptive field properties are generated and sent on to more superficial cortical layers. In vivo and in vitro experiments have provided important information about how the anatomy and physiology of these cells and this layer fit into the functional cortical circuitry. No such data exist for the auditory cortex but are requisite if we are to understand whether ideas about information processing in one sensory cortical area can be generalized to another. Accordingly, we used in vitro slices from which to record and labeled cells in the middle layers of the cat auditory and visual cortices to compare basic anatomical and physiological features of cells recovered in similar layers using the same methods. Our results demonstrate a striking difference in a basic characteristic of two primary sensory cortical areas. In the visual cortex, spiny stellate cells predominate, receive short-latency synaptic inputs, and project to supergranular layers. No such spiny stellate population is encountered in the middle layers of the auditory cortex. Spiny cells that are not stellate or pyramidal are occasionally encountered but, as a group, do not display consistent anatomical or physiological features that might allow them to function as auditory cortical versions of the visual spiny stellates. Rather, pyramidal cells in the lower half of layer 3 and layer 4 appear to have assumed this role. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11447593     DOI: 10.1002/cne.1084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  53 in total

1.  Cell type-specific circuits of cortical layer IV spiny neurons.

Authors:  Dirk Schubert; Rolf Kötter; Karl Zilles; Heiko J Luhmann; Jochen F Staiger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Presynaptic gating of postsynaptically expressed plasticity at mature thalamocortical synapses.

Authors:  Jay A Blundon; Ildar T Bayazitov; Stanislav S Zakharenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Formation and disruption of tonotopy in a large-scale model of the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Markéta Tomková; Jakub Tomek; Ondřej Novák; Ondřej Zelenka; Josef Syka; Cyril Brom
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 4.  On the classification of pathways in the auditory midbrain, thalamus, and cortex.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; S Murray Sherman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Properties of a population of GABAergic cells in murine auditory cortex weakly excited by thalamic stimulation.

Authors:  Yakov I Verbny; Ferenc Erdélyi; Gábor Szabó; Matthew I Banks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The distributed auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jeffery A Winer; Charles C Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Differential dynamics of transient neuronal assemblies in visual compared to auditory cortex.

Authors:  Subhojit Chakraborty; Anders Sandberg; Susan A Greenfield
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Connections of cat auditory cortex: I. Thalamocortical system.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Two thalamic pathways to primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  H L Read; L M Miller; C E Schreiner; J A Winer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.