Literature DB >> 11447380

Cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: results from the asthma policy model.

A D Paltiel1, A L Fuhlbrigge, B T Kitch, B Liljas, S T Weiss, P J Neumann, K M Kuntz .   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids remain underused among United States-based clinicians in treating mild-to-moderate adult asthma.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to estimate the clinical impact, health-related quality of life, cost, and cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in a population of patients aged 18 years and over with FEV(1) = 60% to 100% of predicted normal.
METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of quick relievers (eg, short-acting beta-agonists) on an as-needed basis plus inhaled corticosteroid therapy versus quick relievers alone. A mathematical simulation model was developed to forecast symptoms, acute exacerbations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), health care costs, and cost-effectiveness, measured in both dollars per QALY gained and dollars per symptom-free day gained. All evaluation outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3% and measured over a 10-year planning horizon. Data on the natural history of disease, drug efficacy, patient preferences, and economic costs were obtained from a variety of observational cohorts, randomized trials, and patient surveys.
RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, use of inhaled corticosteroids increases total health costs from roughly $5,200 to $8,400 and improves QALYs from 6.8 to 7.0, implying an incremental cost of $13,500 per QALY gained. Costs per symptom-free day gained are $7.50. Both per-person acute exacerbations and hospitalizations are reduced by 33%. The cost-effectiveness findings are sensitive to the assumed efficacy and side-effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled corticosteroids appear to deliver good comparative value in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. Although more research is needed to understand their impact on preferences regarding side effects and compliance, these findings might be useful for priority-setting in limited resource situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11447380     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2001.116289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  21 in total

1.  Using the effect size to model change in preference values from descriptive health status.

Authors:  Kristy Sanderson; Gavin Andrews; Justine Corry; Helen Lapsley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Surveillance for isocyanate asthma: a model based cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  D M Wild; C A Redlich; A D Paltiel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Modeling the potential impact of a prescription drug copayment increase on the adult asthmatic medicaid population.

Authors:  Seung Jin Bae; A David Paltiel; Anne L Fuhlbrigge; Scott T Weiss; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  The School Inner-City Asthma Intervention Study: Design, rationale, methods, and lessons learned.

Authors:  Wanda Phipatanakul; Petros Koutrakis; Brent A Coull; Choong-Min Kang; Jack M Wolfson; Stephen T Ferguson; Carter R Petty; Mihail Samnaliev; Amparito Cunningham; William J Sheehan; Jonathan M Gaffin; Sachin N Baxi; Peggy S Lai; Perdita Permaul; Liming Liang; Peter S Thorne; Gary Adamkiewicz; Kasey J Brennan; Andrea A Baccarelli; Diane R Gold
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Modeling asthma exacerbations through lung function in children.

Authors:  Ann Chen Wu; Martin Gregory; Steven Kymes; Dennis Lambert; Joshua Edler; Dustin Stwalley; Anne L Fuhlbrigge
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Pharmacogenomic test that predicts response to inhaled corticosteroids in adults with asthma likely to be cost-saving.

Authors:  Ann Chen Wu; Charlene Gay; Melisa D Rett; Natasha Stout; Scott T Weiss; Anne L Fuhlbrigge
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  The validity of generic and condition-specific preference-based instruments: the ability to discriminate asthma control status.

Authors:  Helen M McTaggart-Cowan; Carlo A Marra; Yaling Yang; John E Brazier; Jacek A Kopec; J Mark FitzGerald; Aslam H Anis; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  A simulation model of building intervention impacts on indoor environmental quality, pediatric asthma, and costs.

Authors:  Maria Patricia Fabian; Gary Adamkiewicz; Natasha Kay Stout; Megan Sandel; Jonathan Ian Levy
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Cost analysis of monitoring asthma treatment using sputum cell counts.

Authors:  Liesel D'silva; Amiram Gafni; Lehana Thabane; Lata Jayaram; Pat Hassack; Frederic E Hargreave; Parameswaran Nair
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.409

10.  Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in adults with severe asthma: results from the Asthma Policy Model.

Authors:  Ann C Wu; A David Paltiel; Karen M Kuntz; Scott T Weiss; Anne L Fuhlbrigge
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.