M J Green1, L M Williams, D J Davidson. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia. melissag@psych.usyd.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: On the basis of previous reports of an attentional bias for threat-related emotional material in deluded schizophrenics (e.g. Bentall & Kaney, 1989), the present study examined the proposal that a similar bias would be demonstrated by delusion-prone individuals, reflected by longer response latencies for the task of processing threat-related facially displayed affects (e.g. anger, fear). DESIGN: A non-randomized matched group design was employed to examine the performance of delusion-prone individuals in comparison with a control group. METHODS: 50 psychiatrically healthy participants completed the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI) as an index of delusional ideation (Peters, Day, & Garety, 1996; Peters, Joseph, & Garety, 1999). Subjects were presented with a standard set of facial stimuli depicting happy, sad, neutral, fearful and angry emotion expressions (Mazurski & Bond, 1993). Reaction times for the task of identifying each type of affect were compared between groups of high and low scorers on the PDI. RESULTS: Highly delusion-prone individuals displayed a significant delay in processing angry facial expressions in comparison with low scorers on the PDI. CONCLUSIONS: The increased response latency for processing angry expressions was interpreted as evidence of attentional bias for material posing a threat to the self, supporting previous cognitive data in relation to deluded patients. Threatening facial expressions may be regarded with increased significance by delusion-prone individuals, and it is possible that this bias is involved in the formation of delusional beliefs.
OBJECTIVES: On the basis of previous reports of an attentional bias for threat-related emotional material in deluded schizophrenics (e.g. Bentall & Kaney, 1989), the present study examined the proposal that a similar bias would be demonstrated by delusion-prone individuals, reflected by longer response latencies for the task of processing threat-related facially displayed affects (e.g. anger, fear). DESIGN: A non-randomized matched group design was employed to examine the performance of delusion-prone individuals in comparison with a control group. METHODS: 50 psychiatrically healthy participants completed the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI) as an index of delusional ideation (Peters, Day, & Garety, 1996; Peters, Joseph, & Garety, 1999). Subjects were presented with a standard set of facial stimuli depicting happy, sad, neutral, fearful and angry emotion expressions (Mazurski & Bond, 1993). Reaction times for the task of identifying each type of affect were compared between groups of high and low scorers on the PDI. RESULTS: Highly delusion-prone individuals displayed a significant delay in processing angry facial expressions in comparison with low scorers on the PDI. CONCLUSIONS: The increased response latency for processing angry expressions was interpreted as evidence of attentional bias for material posing a threat to the self, supporting previous cognitive data in relation to deluded patients. Threatening facial expressions may be regarded with increased significance by delusion-prone individuals, and it is possible that this bias is involved in the formation of delusional beliefs.
Authors: Chandlee C Dickey; Lawrence P Panych; Martina M Voglmaier; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Douglas P Terry; Cara Murphy; Rayna Zacks; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Rick P F Wolthusen; Garth Coombs; Emily A Boeke; Stefan Ehrlich; Stephanie N DeCross; Shahin Nasr; Daphne J Holt Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-07-13
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Anna Placentino; Francesco Carletti; Paola Landi; Paul Allen; Simon Surguladze; Francesco Benedetti; Marta Abbamonte; Roberto Gasparotti; Francesco Barale; Jorge Perez; Philip McGuire; Pierluigi Politi Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Dennis R Combs; Aneta Tosheva; David L Penn; Michael R Basso; Jill L Wanner; Kristen Laib Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Aprajita Mohanty; Wendy Heller; Nancy S Koven; Joscelyn E Fisher; John D Herrington; Gregory A Miller Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2008-04-28 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Pedro Bendala-Rodríguez; Cristina Senín-Calderón; Leonardo Peluso-Crespi; Juan F Rodríguez-Testal Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 4.241