| Literature DB >> 11444622 |
Abstract
The possibility that much of the spatial and temporal variation in helminth communities in freshwater fish can be explained in terms of metapopulation theory was tested by examining helminth component communities of eels sampled from 3 localities in the River Exe and 5 of its tributaries on 2 occasions at an interval of 3 years. Four specific predictions of metapopulation theory in relation to community dynamics were tested. The prediction that parasite species could be recognized as common and rare and that this was sensitive to scale was met. The prediction that core species would be more widely distributed and have a higher dispersal ability was met only in part. The prediction that similarity between communities would increase with connectivity and decrease with distance apart was not met. The final prediction that species would go locally extinct and be replaced by rescue effects was not met. There was evidence of local extinctions; not of eel specialists but of species using other fish species as their principal definitive hosts. Eel helminth communities were heavily dominated by 3 species of eel specialists which were relatively stable and responsible for most of the similarity and its changes in space and time. It was concluded that metapopulation theory did not provide a very satisfactory explanation for the changes in the helminth communities in eels and reasons for this included the inherent difficulty of applying metapopulation theory to parasites and the fact that the helminth communities in eels in the River Exe were atypical in being dominated by eel specialists.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2001 PMID: 11444622 DOI: 10.1017/s0031182001007879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitology ISSN: 0031-1820 Impact factor: 3.234