Literature DB >> 11444520

Dosimetric validation for multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a review.

M R Arnfield1, Q Wu, S Tong, R Mohan.   

Abstract

The creation of intricate dose distributions produced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) depends on complex planning systems and specialized mechanical devices. The many possible sources of inaccuracy and the complexity of the dose maps themselves require that a substantial effort be made to ensure that calculated and delivered dose distributions agree. This review provides an overview of the current status of the validation of dose predictions of IMRT planning systems by comparisons with measurements. Emphasis is placed on multileaf collimator- (MLC) based IMRT. Discrepancies between calculations and measurements may be due to any of 3 causes: errors and uncertainties in the dose calculation algorithm, in measurements, or in beam delivery by the accelerator/MLC combination. Some of the factors affecting dosimetry include: the technique employed for modulating the fluence, the dose calculation algorithm and other aspects of the planning system, mechanical limitations of the MLC hardware, dosimetric characteristics of the MLC, such as MLC leakage and rounded leaf ends, the choice of dosimeter, and the measurement geometry and technique. The advantages and drawbacks of various dosimeters including film, ion chambers, thermoluminescent dosimetry, and electronic portal imaging devices are discussed. The steps involved in validating dosimetrically a planning system are outlined, including the various fields that need to be measured, the phantoms that may be used, and measurement techniques. The achievable accuracy of dosimetry for IMRT is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11444520     DOI: 10.1016/s0958-3947(01)00058-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  6 in total

1.  Simulation for improvement of system sensitivity of radiochromic film dosimetry with different band-pass filters and scanner light intensities.

Authors:  Takeshi Kamomae; Yuki Miyabe; Akira Sawada; Osamu Matoba; Manabu Nakata; Shinsuke Yano; Toru Takakura; Takashi Mizowaki; Akio Itoh; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-03-17

2.  Comparison of target coverage and dose to organs at risk between simultaneous integrated-boost whole-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy and junctioned intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional radiotherapy field in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin-Beom Chung; Jeong-Woo Lee; Jae-Sung Kim; In-Ah Kim; Doo-Hyun Lee; Yon-Lae Kim; Kyoung-Sik Choi; Bo-Young Choe; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-05-10

3.  Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alok Kumar; Gautam Mukherjee; Girigesh Yadav; Vinod Pandey; Kalyan Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2007-10

4.  Compensators: an alternative IMRT delivery technique.

Authors:  Sha X Chang; Timothy J Cullip; Katharin M Deschesne; Elizabeth P Miller; Julian G Rosenman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric characteristics of a cubic-block-piled compensator for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the Pinnacle radiotherapy treatment planning system.

Authors:  Koji Sasaki; Yasunori Obata
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  High spatial resolution inorganic scintillator detector for high-energy X-ray beam at small field irradiation.

Authors:  Sree Bash Chandra Debnath; Carole Fauquet; Agnes Tallet; Anthony Goncalves; Sébastien Lavandier; Franck Jandard; Didier Tonneau; Julien Darreon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.