Literature DB >> 11443407

Safety of conscious sedation in interventional radiology.

A Arepally1, D Oechsle, S Kirkwood, S J Savader.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify rates of adverse events associated with the use of conscious sedation in interventional radiology.
METHODS: In a 5-month period, prospective data were collected on patients undergoing conscious sedation for interventional radiology procedures (n = 594). Adverse events were categorized as respiratory, sedative, or major adverse events. Respiratory adverse events were those that required oral airway placement, ambu bag, or jaw thrust. Sedation adverse events were unresponsiveness, oxygen saturation less than 90%, use of flumazenil/naloxone, or agitation. Major adverse events were hypotension, intubation, CPR, or cardiac arrest. The frequency of adverse events for the five most common radiology procedures were determined.
RESULTS: The five most common procedures (total n = 541) were biliary tube placement/exchange (n = 182), tunneled catheter placement (n = 135), diagnostic arteriography (n = 125), vascular interventions (n = 52), and other catheter insertions (n = 46). Rates for respiratory, sedation, and major adverse events were 4.7%, 4.2%, and 2.0%, respectively. The most frequent major adverse event was hypotension (2.0%). Biliary procedures had the highest rate of total adverse events (p < .05) and respiratory adverse events (p < .05).
CONCLUSION: The frequency of adverse events is low with the use of conscious sedation during interventional procedures. The highest rates occurred during biliary interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443407     DOI: 10.1007/s002700002549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of moderate sedation for radiologic non-vascular intervention.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  An approach to moderate sedation simulation training.

Authors:  Catherine D Tobin; Carlee A Clark; Matthew D McEvoy; J G Reves; John J Schaefer; Bethany J Wolf; Scott T Reeves
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  Sedation and analgesia in the performance of interventional procedures.

Authors:  Stephen Johnson
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Management of Do Not Resuscitate Orders Before Invasive Procedures.

Authors:  Jennifer Wong; Amy Gravely; Peter G Duane
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-02

5.  Propofol Compared to Midazolam Sedation and to General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Microwave Ablation in Patients with Hepatic Malignancies: A Single-Center Comparative Analysis of Three Historical Cohorts.

Authors:  Robbert S Puijk; Valentijn Ziedses des Plantes; Sanne Nieuwenhuizen; Alette H Ruarus; Laurien G P H Vroomen; Marcus C de Jong; Bart Geboers; Caroline J Hoedemaker-Boon; Deirdre H Thöne-Passchier; Ceylan C Gerçek; Jan J J de Vries; Petrousjka M P van den Tol; Hester J Scheffer; Martijn R Meijerink
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  CT-guided percutaneous drainage of abdominopelvic collections: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Massimo De Filippo; Sara Puglisi; Fabiano D'Amuri; Francesco Gentili; Ilaria Paladini; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Umberto Maestroni; Paolo Del Rio; Francesco Ziglioli; Francesco Pagnini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.469

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.