PURPOSE: We examined the incidence and distribution of photosensitivity among the different age groups and different types of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Furthermore, we considered the influence of ethnic and geographic factors on the incidence of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) in epilepsy patients. METHODS: We analyzed the responses to intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) by using a Grass PS22 or PS33 photic stimulator for in 2,187 unselected patients with epilepsy who were treated in our center. RESULTS: The classic PPR was elicited in 37 (1.7%) patients. The mean age of these 37 patients was 17.0 years. The subpopulation of patients having PPR included 2.0% of all patients with symptomatic generalized epilepsy. 5.6% (p < 0.01) of those with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, 0.7% of those with symptomatic localization-related epilepsy, and 2.9% of those with undetermined epilepsy. PPR accounted for 17.4% (p < 0.01) of the patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, 7.6% (p < 0.01) of those with grand mal on awakening, and 6.1% (p < 0.01) of those with symptomatic occipital lobe epilepsy. The incidence of PPR increased in patients up to age 15 years, and suddenly decreased after age 20 years. CONCLUSION: The present study presents the first report from eastern Asia, analyzing the incidence of PPR with a restricted definition comparable to the other studies, and the rate of PPR was relatively low compared with the studies performed in the European countries. We could confirm the clear relation between age and positive PPR.
PURPOSE: We examined the incidence and distribution of photosensitivity among the different age groups and different types of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Furthermore, we considered the influence of ethnic and geographic factors on the incidence of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) in epilepsypatients. METHODS: We analyzed the responses to intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) by using a Grass PS22 or PS33 photic stimulator for in 2,187 unselected patients with epilepsy who were treated in our center. RESULTS: The classic PPR was elicited in 37 (1.7%) patients. The mean age of these 37 patients was 17.0 years. The subpopulation of patients having PPR included 2.0% of all patients with symptomatic generalized epilepsy. 5.6% (p < 0.01) of those with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, 0.7% of those with symptomatic localization-related epilepsy, and 2.9% of those with undetermined epilepsy. PPR accounted for 17.4% (p < 0.01) of the patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, 7.6% (p < 0.01) of those with grand mal on awakening, and 6.1% (p < 0.01) of those with symptomatic occipital lobe epilepsy. The incidence of PPR increased in patients up to age 15 years, and suddenly decreased after age 20 years. CONCLUSION: The present study presents the first report from eastern Asia, analyzing the incidence of PPR with a restricted definition comparable to the other studies, and the rate of PPR was relatively low compared with the studies performed in the European countries. We could confirm the clear relation between age and positive PPR.
Authors: Amy Shakeshaft; Naim Panjwani; Amber Collingwood; Holly Crudgington; Anna Hall; Danielle M Andrade; Christoph P Beier; Choong Yi Fong; Elena Gardella; Joanna Gesche; David A Greenberg; Khalid Hamandi; Jeanette Koht; Kheng Seang Lim; Rikke S Møller; Ching Ching Ng; Alessandro Orsini; Mark I Rees; Guido Rubboli; Kaja K Selmer; Pasquale Striano; Marte Syvertsen; Rhys H Thomas; Jana Zarubova; Mark P Richardson; Lisa J Strug; Deb K Pal Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 4.379