Literature DB >> 11442135

The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders: general emotional or disorder specificity?

E S Becker1, M Rinck, J Margraf, W T Roth.   

Abstract

Selective attentional biases, often documented with a modified Stroop task, are considered to play an important role in the etiology and maintenance of anxiety. Two competing explanations for these effects are selectivity for highly emotional words in general vs. selectivity for disorder-specific words. We tested these explanations in 32 patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), 29 patients with social phobia (SP), and 31 non-anxious controls. Stimuli were of four kinds: GAD-related words, SP-related words, words with a neutral valence, and words with a positive valence. Different attentional biases were observed: GAD patients were slowed by all types of emotional words, while SP patients were distracted specifically by speech-related words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11442135     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6185(01)00055-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anxiety Disord        ISSN: 0887-6185


  40 in total

1.  Rationality and emotionality: serotonin transporter genotype influences reasoning bias.

Authors:  Melanie Stollstorff; Stephanie E Bean; Lindsay M Anderson; Joseph M Devaney; Chandan J Vaidya
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Reward expectation regulates brain responses to task-relevant and task-irrelevant emotional words: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Di Wang; Liyan Ji
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Anxiety impact on scuba performance and underwater cognitive processing ability.

Authors:  Feng-Hua Tsai; Wen-Lan Wu; Jing-Min Liang; Hsiu-Tao Hsu; Te-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 0.887

4.  Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder exhibit altered emotional processing and attentional control during an emotional Stroop task.

Authors:  M M Khanna; A S Badura-Brack; T J McDermott; C M Embury; A I Wiesman; A Shepherd; T J Ryan; E Heinrichs-Graham; T W Wilson
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Feasibility of NIRS-based neurofeedback training in social anxiety disorder: behavioral and neural correlates.

Authors:  Ann-Christin S Kimmig; Thomas Dresler; Justin Hudak; Florian B Haeussinger; Dirk Wildgruber; Andreas J Fallgatter; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Benjamin Kreifelts
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Insula activation is modulated by attention shifting in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Duval; Sonalee A Joshi; Stefanie Russman Block; James L Abelson; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 7.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

8.  Snake fearfulness is associated with sustained competitive biases to visual snake features: hypervigilance without avoidance.

Authors:  Menton McGinnis Deweese; Margaret M Bradley; Peter J Lang; Søren K Andersen; Matthias M Müller; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Information processing bias and pharmacotherapy outcome in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Amanda R W Steiner; Andrew J Petkus; Hoang Nguyen; Julie Loebach Wetherell
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2012-11-21

10.  Effects of threat cues on attentional shifting, disengagement and response slowing in anxious individuals.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Amanda Holmes; Matthew Garner; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.