Literature DB >> 11440823

Mechanisms for differences in monozygous twins.

P Gringras1, W Chen.   

Abstract

Monozygous (MZ) twins are often described as being physically and genetically identical. Clinical determination of zygosity relies on the assumption that any physical differences between a pair of twins imply they are dizygous. Most twin research relies on the assumption that dizygous twins share approximately 50% of the same genes, whereas monozygous twins share 100%. There is, however, increasing evidence to challenge both these assumptions. In this review, we describe a number of intrauterine effects and genetic mechanisms that may result in phenotypic, genotypic, and epigenetic differences between monozygous twins. Newer molecular techniques are resulting in such differences being increasingly commonly recognised. The potential for differences in monozygotic twin pairs is an important consideration for both clinicians and researchers involved in twin work.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11440823     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(01)00171-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  20 in total

1.  Case report: identical twins revealing discordant hypodontia. The rationale of dental arch differences in monozygotic twins.

Authors:  M Varela; M J Trujillo-Tiebas; P Garcia-Camba
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2011-12

2.  Quantifying the genetic influence on mammalian vascular tree structure.

Authors:  Robb Glenny; Susan Bernard; Blazej Neradilek; Nayak Polissar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phenotypically concordant and discordant monozygotic twins display different DNA copy-number-variation profiles.

Authors:  Carl E G Bruder; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Antoinet A C J Gijsbers; Robin Andersson; Stephen Erickson; Teresita Diaz de Ståhl; Uwe Menzel; Johanna Sandgren; Desiree von Tell; Andrzej Poplawski; Michael Crowley; Chiquito Crasto; E Christopher Partridge; Hemant Tiwari; David B Allison; Jan Komorowski; Gert-Jan B van Ommen; Dorret I Boomsma; Nancy L Pedersen; Johan T den Dunnen; Karin Wirdefeldt; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Quantitative assessment of DNA methylation: Potential applications for disease diagnosis, classification, and prognosis in clinical settings.

Authors:  Romulo Martin Brena; Tim Hui-Ming Huang; Christoph Plass
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Analysis of mitochondrial length heteroplasmy in monozygous and non-monozygous siblings.

Authors:  S Lutz-Bonengel; U Schmidt; T Sänger; M Heinrich; P M Schneider; S Pollak
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Monozygotic twin discordant for Down syndrome: mos 47,XX,+21/46,XX and 46,XX.

Authors:  Sun Ah Choi; Jung Min Ko; Choong Ho Shin; Sei Won Yang; Jin Sun Choi; Sun Kyung Oh
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  A study of the birth weight-obesity relation using a longitudinal cohort and sibling and twin pairs.

Authors:  Natalie S The; Linda S Adair; Penny Gordon-Larsen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Prenatal growth in humans and postnatal brain maturation into late adolescence.

Authors:  Armin Raznahan; Deanna Greenstein; Nancy Raitano Lee; Liv S Clasen; Jay N Giedd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Genetic, environmental and stochastic factors in monozygotic twin discordance with a focus on epigenetic differences.

Authors:  Witold Czyz; Julia M Morahan; George C Ebers; Sreeram V Ramagopalan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sergio E Baranzini; Joann Mudge; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh; Pouya Khankhanian; Irina Khrebtukova; Neil A Miller; Lu Zhang; Andrew D Farmer; Callum J Bell; Ryan W Kim; Gregory D May; Jimmy E Woodward; Stacy J Caillier; Joseph P McElroy; Refujia Gomez; Marcelo J Pando; Leonda E Clendenen; Elena E Ganusova; Faye D Schilkey; Thiruvarangan Ramaraj; Omar A Khan; Jim J Huntley; Shujun Luo; Pui-Yan Kwok; Thomas D Wu; Gary P Schroth; Jorge R Oksenberg; Stephen L Hauser; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.