Literature DB >> 11439420

Predicting analysis times in randomized clinical trials.

E Bagiella1, D F Heitjan.   

Abstract

Randomized clinical trial designs commonly include one or more planned interim analyses. At these times an external monitoring committee reviews the accumulated data and determines whether it is scientifically and ethically appropriate for the study to continue. With failure-time endpoints, it is common to schedule analyses at the times of occurrence of specified landmark events, such as the 50th event, the 100th event, and so on. Because interim analyses can impose considerable logistical burdens, it is worthwhile predicting their timing as accurately as possible. We describe two model-based methods for making such predictions during the course of a trial. First, we obtain a point prediction by extrapolating the cumulative mortality into the future and selecting the date when the expected number of deaths is equal to the landmark number. Second, we use a Bayesian simulation scheme to generate a predictive distribution of milestone times; prediction intervals are quantiles of this distribution. We illustrate our method with an analysis of data from a trial of immunotherapy in the treatment of chronic granulomatous disease. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11439420     DOI: 10.1002/sim.843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  Milestone prediction for time-to-event endpoint monitoring in clinical trials.

Authors:  Fang-Shu Ou; Martin Heller; Qian Shi
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  Projecting Event-Based Analysis Dates in Clinical Trials: An Illustration Based on the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) Collaboration. Projecting analysis dates for the IDEA collaboration.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Axel M Grothey; James Paul; Irene Floriani; Franck Bonnetain; Donna Niedzwiecki; Takeharu Yamanaka; Ioannis Souglakos; Greg Yothers; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Forum Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  Cure modeling in real-time prediction: How much does it help?

Authors:  Gui-Shuang Ying; Qiang Zhang; Yu Lan; Yimei Li; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Predicting analysis times in randomized clinical trials with cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Tai-Tsang Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.