Literature DB >> 11438956

A comparison of different lysis buffers to assess allele dropout from single cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

A R Thornhill1, J A McGrath, R A Eady, P R Braude, A H Handyside.   

Abstract

Single cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) requires high efficiency and accuracy. Allele dropout (ADO), the random amplification failure of one of the two parental alleles, remains the most significant problem in PCR-based PGD testing since it can result in serious misdiagnosis for compound heterozygous or autosomal dominant conditions. A number of different strategies (including the use of lysis buffers to break down the cell and make the DNA accessible) have been employed to combat ADO with varying degrees of success, yet there is still no consensus among PGD centres over which lysis buffer should be used (ESHRE PGD Consortium, 1999). To address this issue, PCR amplification of three genes (CFTR, LAMA3 and PKP1) at different chromosomal loci was investigated. Single lymphocytes from individuals heterozygous for mutations within each of the three genes were collected and lysed in either alkaline lysis buffer (ALB) or proteinase K/SDS lysis buffer (PK). PCR amplification efficiencies were comparable between alkaline lysis and proteinase K lysis for PCR products spanning each of the three mutated loci (DeltaF508 in CFTR 90% vs 88%; R650X in LAMA3 82% vs 78%; and Y71X in PKP1 91% vs 87%). While there was no appreciable difference between ADO rates between the two lysis buffers for the LAMA3 PCR product (25% vs 26%), there were significant differences in ADO rates between ALB and PK for the CFTR PCR product (0% vs 23%) and the PKP1 PCR product (8% vs 56%). Based on these results, we are currently using ALB in preference to PK/SDS buffer for the lysis of cells in clinical PGD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11438956     DOI: 10.1002/pd.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  14 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Karen Snow
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice.

Authors:  E Kanavakis; J Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for SHOX-related haploinsufficiency in conjunction with trisomy 21 detection by molecular analysis.

Authors:  Gheona Altarescu; Orit Reish; Paul Renbaum; Ester Kasterstein; Dvorah Komarovsky; Alisa Komsky; Orna Bern; Dvorah Strassburger; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Raphael Ron-El
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for nonsyndromic deafness by polar body and blastomere biopsy.

Authors:  Gheona Altarescu; Talia Eldar-Geva; Baruch Brooks; Edith Zylber-Haran; Irit Varshaver; Ehud J Margalioth; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Paul Renbaum
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Use of parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes as an experimental model for evaluation of polar body based PGD assay performance.

Authors:  Alessio Paffoni; Valentina Paracchini; Stefania Ferrari; Claudia Scarduelli; Manuela Seia; Domenico A Coviello; Guido Ragni
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Recent Developments in Single-Cell RNA-Seq of Microorganisms.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Jiaxin Gao; Yanyi Huang; Jianbin Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Whole genome amplification in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Ying-ming Zheng; Ning Wang; Lei Li; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  Identification of a novel single nucleotide polymorphism of HADHA gene at a referred primer-binding site during pre-diagnostic tests for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Hyoung-Song Lee; Hye Won Choi; Chun Kyu Lim; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang; Han-Wook Yoo; Jin-Ho Choi; Jin Hyun Jun
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Single cell co-amplification of polymorphic markers for the indirect preimplantation genetic diagnosis of hemophilia A, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, X-linked hydrocephalus and incontinentia pigmenti loci on Xq28.

Authors:  Nadine Gigarel; Nelly Frydman; Philippe Burlet; Violaine Kerbrat; Julie Steffann; René Frydman; Arnold Munnich; Pierre F Ray
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency by simultaneous analysis of duplex-nested PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a case report.

Authors:  Hyoung-Song Lee; Jin Hyun Jun; Hye Won Choi; Chun Kyu Lim; Han-Wook Yoo; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.