Literature DB >> 11438892

Financial and clinical impact of false-positive blood culture results.

M L Waltzman1, M Harper.   

Abstract

During a 4-year period, 9465 specimens for blood culture were obtained from 11,911 highly febrile, otherwise healthy young children. Of these specimens, 87 (0.9%) yielded nonpathogens and were considered to be false-positive blood culture results (FPBCRs). Seventy-two of the patients who provided these specimens were treated on an outpatient basis (resulting in $10,821 in treatment charges), and 7 were admitted to the hospital (resulting in $16,200 in charges) as a result of the FPBCRs. Studies performed during follow-up included a second blood culture (21 patients), complete blood cell count (11), urine analysis and culture (5), lumbar puncture (3), and chest radiography (3). Only a small minority of patients were hospitalized or underwent invasive procedures. The charges associated with FPBCRs are very small in comparison to the initial charges of culturing specimens obtained from children considered to be at risk. Concern about the consequences of FPBCRs should not deter clinicians from performing indicated cultures for children who potentially have bacteremia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11438892     DOI: 10.1086/321881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  7 in total

Review 1.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Blood Culture Contaminants in a Paediatric Population Retrospective study from a tertiary hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Mohamed A El-Naggari; Sharef W Al-Mulaabed; Zakaria Al-Muharrmi; Renjith Mani; Rana Abdelrahim; Reem Abdwani
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-06-20

Review 3.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem

Authors:  Gary V Doern; Karen C Carroll; Daniel J Diekema; Kevin W Garey; Mark E Rupp; Melvin P Weinstein; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Reducing blood culture contamination by a simple informational intervention.

Authors:  A Roth; A E Wiklund; A S Pålsson; E Z Melander; M Wullt; J Cronqvist; M Walder; E Sturegård
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Daily chlorhexidine bathing to reduce bacteraemia in critically ill children: a multicentre, cluster-randomised, crossover trial.

Authors:  Aaron M Milstone; Alexis Elward; Xiaoyan Song; Danielle M Zerr; Rachel Orscheln; Kathleen Speck; Daniel Obeng; Nicholas G Reich; Susan E Coffin; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Staphylococcus aureus and repeat bacteremia in febrile patients as early signs of sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Teruya Nakamura; Takashi Daimon; Norio Mouri; Hirotada Masuda; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Estimated Clinical and Economic Impact through Use of a Novel Blood Collection Device To Reduce Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: a Cost-Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Erik Skoglund; Casey J Dempsey; Hua Chen; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.