Literature DB >> 11437003

Effects of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA.

B A Nerbonne1, B Vondracek.   

Abstract

Best management practices (BMPs) have been developed to address soil loss and the resulting sedimentation of streams, but information is lacking regarding their benefits to stream biota. We compared instream physical habitat and invertebrate and fish assemblages from farms with BMP to those from farms with conventional agricultural practices within the Whitewater River watershed of southeastern Minnesota, USA, in 1996 and 1997. Invertebrate assemblages were assessed using the US EPA's rapid bioassessment protocol (RBP), and fish assemblages were assessed with two indices of biotic integrity (IBIs). Sites were classified by upland land use (BMP or conventional practices) and riparian management (grass, grazed, or wooded buffer). Physical habitat characteristics differed across buffer types, but not upland land use, using an analysis of covariance, with buffer width and stream as covariates. Percent fines and embeddedness were negatively correlated with buffer width. Stream sites along grass buffers generally had significantly lower percent fines, embeddedness, and exposed streambank soil, but higher percent cover and overhanging vegetation when compared with sites that had grazed or wooded buffers. RBP and IBI scores were not significantly different across upland land use or riparian buffer type but did show several correlations with instream physical habitat variables. RBP and IBI scores were both negatively correlated with percent fines and embeddedness and positively correlated with width-to-depth ratio. The lack of difference in RBP or IBI scores across buffer types suggests that biotic indicators may not respond to local changes, that other factors not measured may be important, or that greater improvements in watershed condition are necessary for changes in biota to be apparent. Grass buffers may be a viable alternative for riparian management, especially if sedimentation and streambank stability are primary concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11437003     DOI: 10.1007/s002670010209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  18 in total

1.  Biological assessment to support ecological recovery of a degraded headwater system.

Authors:  Scott D Longing; Brian E Haggard
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  An assessment of the impacts of timber plantations on water quality and biodiversity values of Marbellup Brook, Western Australia.

Authors:  Barbara Ann Stewart
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Effects of Best Management Practice on Ecological Condition: Does Location Matter?

Authors:  Roger Holmes; David G Armanini; Adam G Yates
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Effects of land use intensification on fish assemblages in Mediterranean climate streams.

Authors:  P Matono; D Sousa; M Ilhéu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Defining river types in a Mediterranean area: a methodology for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive.

Authors:  Antoni Munné; Narcís Prat
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Land use, spatial scale, and stream systems: lessons from an agricultural region.

Authors:  Bruce Vondracek; Kristen L Blann; Carson B Cox; Julia Frost Nerbonne; Karen G Mumford; Brian A Nerbonne; Laurie A Sovell; Julie K H Zimmerman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Farm riparian land use and management: driving factors and tensions between technical and ecological functions.

Authors:  Claudine Thenail; Jacques Baudry
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Influence of catchment-scale military land use on stream physical and organic matter variables in small southeastern plains catchments (USA).

Authors:  Kelly O Maloney; Patrick J Mulholland; Jack W Feminella
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Stream communities along a catchment land-use gradient: subsidy-stress responses to pastoral development.

Authors:  Dev K Niyogi; Mark Koren; Chris J Arbuckle; Colin R Townsend
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Fish assemblage responses to forest cover.

Authors:  Chris L Burcher; Matthew E McTammany; E Fred Benfield; Gene S Helfman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.