Literature DB >> 11436219

Magnetic resonance microscopy at 17.6-Tesla on chicken embryos in vitro.

B Hogers1, D Gross, V Lehmann, H J de Groot, A de Roos, A C Gittenberger-de Groot, R E Poelmann.   

Abstract

The non-destructive nature and the rapid acquisition of a three-dimensional image makes magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) very attractive and suitable for functional imaging investigations. We explored the use of an ultra high magnetic field for MRM to increase image quality per image acquisition time. Improved image quality was characterized by a better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), better image contrast, and higher resolution compared to images obtained at lower magnetic field strengths. Fixed chicken embryos at several stages of development were imaged at 7.0-T (300 MHz) and at 17.6-T (750 MHz). Maximum intensity projection resulted in three-dimensional vascular images with ample detail of the embryonic vasculature. We showed that at 750 MHz frequency, an image with approximately three times better SNR can be obtained by T1-weighting using a standard gadolinium contrast agent, compared to the same measurement at 300 MHz. The image contrast improved by around 20 percent and the contrast-to-noise ratio improved by almost a factor of 3.5. Smaller blood vessels of the vascular system were identified at the high field, which indicates a better image resolution. Thus, ultra high field is beneficial for MRM and opens new areas for functional imaging research, in particular when SNR, resolution, and contrast are limited by acquisition time. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11436219     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Visualization of mouse spinal cord microscopic structures by use of ex vivo quantitative micro-CT images.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Saito; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-06-24

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of iron-oxide labeled SK-Mel 28 human melanoma cells in the chick embryo using a clinical whole body MRI scanner.

Authors:  M Oppitz; J Pintaske; R Kehlbach; F Schick; G Schriek; C Busch
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Whole animal imaging.

Authors:  Gurpreet Singh Sandhu; Luis Solorio; Ann-Marie Broome; Nicolas Salem; Jeff Kolthammer; Tejas Shah; Chris Flask; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

4.  Micro-magnetic resonance imaging study of live quail embryos during embryonic development.

Authors:  Suzanne Duce; Fiona Morrison; Monique Welten; Glenn Baggott; Cheryll Tickle
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  The CAM cancer xenograft as a model for initial evaluation of MR labelled compounds.

Authors:  Zhi Zuo; Tatiana Syrovets; Yuzhou Wu; Susanne Hafner; Ina Vernikouskaya; Weina Liu; Genshan Ma; Tanja Weil; Thomas Simmet; Volker Rasche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The development of the heart and microcirculation: role of shear stress.

Authors:  Robert E Poelmann; Adriana C Gittenberger-de Groot; Beerend P Hierck
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Micro-magnetic resonance imaging of avian embryos.

Authors:  Xiaojing Li; Jia Liu; Megan Davey; Suzanne Duce; Neema Jaberi; Gang Liu; Gemma Davidson; Seaneen Tenent; Ruth Mahood; Phoebe Brown; Craig Cunningham; Andrew Bain; Kevin Beattie; Laura McDonald; Katy Schmidt; Matthew Towers; Cheryll Tickle; Sandy Chudek
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Morphologic and biometric evaluation of chick embryo eyes in ovo using 7 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Tobias Lindner; Ronja Klose; Felix Streckenbach; Thomas Stahnke; Stefan Hadlich; Jens-Peter Kühn; Rudolf F Guthoff; Andreas Wree; Anne-Marie Neumann; Marcus Frank; Änne Glass; Sönke Langner; Oliver Stachs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.