D A Neil1, S G Hubscher. 1. Department of Pathology, Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. d.neil@bham.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The progression of parenchymal changes in liver allograft biopsies due to preservation-reperfusion injury (PRI) and their differentiation from rejection related changes is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine which changes in a 1-week posttransplant biopsy could be attributed to PRI and which to acute rejection. METHODS: One week protocol liver transplant biopsies from patients with mild PRI (day 1 AST<400 IU/L) were compared with those from patients with severe PRI (day 1 AST>2000 IU/L). Parenchymal changes (cholestasis, ballooning, steatosis, necrosis) and rejection-related inflammatory features (portal tract inflammation, bile duct inflammation, portal vein endothelial inflammation, hepatic vein endothelial inflammation, and centrilobular inflammation) were blindly assessed semiquantitatively. RESULTS: Fat, cholestasis, and hepatocyte ballooning were significantly worse in the severe PRI group, and these features showed no correlation with histological features related to acute rejection. Centrilobular hepatocyte necrosis correlated with hepatic venular endothelial inflammation and centrilobular inflammation but not with rejection related features in portal tracts or with PRI. These findings suggest that centrilobular necrosis is a manifestation of a rejection-related parenchymal injury and may involve different pathogenetic mechanisms to rejection-related features in portal tracts. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that in early posttransplant biopsies, fat, cholestasis, and ballooning can largely be attributed to PRI. By contrast, centrilobular hepatocyte loss should be suspected as a rejection related phenomenon, even if typical portal tract changes are not prominent, and augmentation of immunosuppression should be considered.
BACKGROUND: The progression of parenchymal changes in liver allograft biopsies due to preservation-reperfusion injury (PRI) and their differentiation from rejection related changes is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine which changes in a 1-week posttransplant biopsy could be attributed to PRI and which to acute rejection. METHODS: One week protocol liver transplant biopsies from patients with mild PRI (day 1 AST<400 IU/L) were compared with those from patients with severe PRI (day 1 AST>2000 IU/L). Parenchymal changes (cholestasis, ballooning, steatosis, necrosis) and rejection-related inflammatory features (portal tract inflammation, bile duct inflammation, portal vein endothelial inflammation, hepatic vein endothelial inflammation, and centrilobular inflammation) were blindly assessed semiquantitatively. RESULTS: Fat, cholestasis, and hepatocyte ballooning were significantly worse in the severe PRI group, and these features showed no correlation with histological features related to acute rejection. Centrilobular hepatocyte necrosis correlated with hepatic venular endothelial inflammation and centrilobular inflammation but not with rejection related features in portal tracts or with PRI. These findings suggest that centrilobular necrosis is a manifestation of a rejection-related parenchymal injury and may involve different pathogenetic mechanisms to rejection-related features in portal tracts. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that in early posttransplant biopsies, fat, cholestasis, and ballooning can largely be attributed to PRI. By contrast, centrilobular hepatocyte loss should be suspected as a rejection related phenomenon, even if typical portal tract changes are not prominent, and augmentation of immunosuppression should be considered.
Authors: Justin D Ellett; Carl Atkinson; Zachary P Evans; Zainab Amani; Edward Balish; Michael G Schmidt; Rick G Schnellmann; Kenneth D Chavin Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Justin D Ellett; Carl Atkinson; Zachary P Evans; Zainab Amani; Edward Balish; Michael G Schmidt; Nico van Rooijen; Rick G Schnellmann; Kenneth D Chavin Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-04-16 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Zhen-Yu Xiao; Babak Banan; Jianluo Jia; Pamela T Manning; Ronald R Hiebsch; Muthukumar Gunasekaran; Gundumi A Upadhya; William A Frazier; Thalachallour Mohanakumar; Yiing Lin; William C Chapman Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Justin D Ellett; Zachary P Evans; Carl Atkinson; Michael G Schmidt; Rick G Schnellmann; Kenneth D Chavin Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Justin D Ellett; Zachary P Evans; Jennifer H Fiorini; Ryan N Fiorini; Julia K Haines; Michael G Schmidt; Kenneth D Chavin Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-07-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Zachary P Evans; Justin D Ellett; Michael G Schmidt; Rick G Schnellmann; Kenneth D Chavin Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-12-17 Impact factor: 5.157