Literature DB >> 11435372

The pattern of ambulance arrivals in the emergency department of an acute care hospital in Singapore.

E Seow1, H P Wong, A Phe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the pattern of ambulance arrivals in the emergency department (ED) and (2) to review resource allocation based on these data.
METHODS: All (13 697) ambulance arrivals in 1996 to the ED of Tan Tock Seng Hospital were studied and where relevant compared with the walk in and total arrivals of the same year. The following data were obtained from computer records: (a) patients' demographic data; (b) number of ambulance arrivals by hour; (c) the classification of the ambulance arrivals by emergency or non-emergency, trauma or non-trauma; (d) cause of injury for trauma cases; (e) discharge status.
RESULTS: The ambulance arrivals in 1996 constituted 12.4% of the patient load for this department. There was no difference in modes of patient arrival to the ED by sex and ethnic group. However, there was significant evidence to show that more patients age > 60 came by ambulance than those age < 12 (p << 0.01). Some 98.5% of the ambulance arrivals were emergencies; 40.7% of the ambulance arrivals were attributable to trauma versus 27.3% of the walk in arrivals. The majority of the trauma cases brought in by ambulance were because of road traffic accidents (15.3%) or home accidents (7.4%). The peak in ambulance arrivals was between 2100-2300 hours compared with 1000-1200 for the walk in arrivals. More than half of the ambulance arrivals were admitted.
CONCLUSION: In planning resource allocation and in the development of contingency plans, the resource use of ambulance patients and the pattern of their arrivals should be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11435372      PMCID: PMC1725637          DOI: 10.1136/emj.18.4.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

Review 1.  Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances.

Authors:  H Snooks; H Wrigley; S George; E Thomas; H Smith; A Glasper
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-07

2.  A time-motion study of the emergency medical services turnaround interval.

Authors:  D C Cone; S J Davidson; Q Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  A multisite survey of factors contributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transports.

Authors:  A J Billittier; R Moscati; D Janicke; E B Lerner; J Seymour; D Olsson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Patient-specific predictors of ambulance use.

Authors:  D W Rucker; R A Edwards; H R Burstin; A C O'Neil; T A Brennan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why?

Authors:  F F Palazzo; O J Warner; M Harron; A Sadana
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-11
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Epidemiology of the Injuries and Outcomes in Two First-Level Trauma Centers in Colombia Using the Pan-American Trauma Registry System.

Authors:  Anu Ramachandran; Anju Ranjit; Cheryl K Zogg; Juan P Herrera-Escobar; Jessica R Appelson; Luis F Pino; Michel B Aboutanous; Adil H Haider; Carlos A Ordonez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Patterns of urban violent injury: a spatio-temporal analysis.

Authors:  Michael Cusimano; Sean Marshall; Claus Rinner; Depeng Jiang; Mary Chipman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Retrospective one-million-subject fixed-cohort survey of utilization of emergency departments due to traumatic causes in Taiwan, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Nan-Ping Yang; Dinh-Van Phan; Nien-Tzu Chang; Yi-Hui Lee; Jin-Chyr Hsu; Ren-Hao Pan; Chien-Lung Chan; Dachen Chu
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.