Literature DB >> 11435370

Blue calls--time for a change?

R Brown1, J Warwick.   

Abstract

Prior alert via a landline telephone ("blue call") is commonly used to warn accident and emergency (A&E) departments of the impending arrival of a seriously ill or injured patient. There are no published indications for making such calls or validated protocols on message content. Submitted telephone information has the potential for distortion as it is passed through the control centre resulting in inappropriate resource allocation. This study focuses on the quality and content of the message in the context of the available patient details as well as reviewing the clinical indications for the call. Data were collected on patients for whom "blue calls" were made to an A&E department over three months of 1998. Patients with life threatening conditions who were brought by non-blue light ambulance were identified during the same period. Similar details were collected on these critical patients. Of the 189 "blue calls" with complete details, 73% were admitted, (12% to ITU) and 18% died. Sixty nine per cent of cases were medical, 26% trauma and 5% obstetric. Pre-hospital observations were missing for 25% of patients (excluding patients in cardiac arrest), suggesting that the decisions to make a pre-alert call may have been based on subjective criteria in a significant minority. Information given over the telephone invariably included age, sex and presenting complaint but details of the current condition of the patient were included in only 11%. On reviewing pre-hospital information, a consultant in A&E and an ambulance paramedic judged that a prior alert was justified in 93% but additional information would be helpful in 52% of cases to correctly mobilise resources. Seventy five "clinically critical" patients were found in the three months of the study. Clinically critical patients were patients who had no prior alert, transported by ambulance, who were subsequently admitted to intensive care, theatre, or other high dependency areas. They included 27 patients with symptoms of a myocardial infarction. These patients may have benefited from prior alert. A protocol is suggested to provide criteria for making a prior alert to the A&E department via a landline connection. A standardised message structure would be used using vital signs and mechanism of injury or type of illness to assist in hospital preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11435370      PMCID: PMC1725615          DOI: 10.1136/emj.18.4.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  11 in total

1.  Rapid ambulance protocol for acute stroke.

Authors:  J Harbison; A Massey; L Barnett; D Hodge; G A Ford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Effects of emergency ambulance transportation on heart rate, blood pressure, corticotropin, and cortisol.

Authors:  K Witzel
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill?

Authors:  M W Cooke; S Jinks
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05

4.  Study of early warning of accident and emergency departments by ambulance services.

Authors:  J F Harrison; M W Cooke
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-09

5.  Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition.

Authors:  P Benner; C Tanner
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.220

Review 6.  Scoring systems and triage from the field.

Authors:  A M Maslanka
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Effect of vital signs on advanced life support interventions for prehospital patients.

Authors:  L H Brown; N H Prasad
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  A prospective comparison of paramedic judgment and the trauma triage rule in the prehospital setting.

Authors:  G R Fries; G McCalla; M A Levitt; R Cordova
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Prehospital classification combined with an in-hospital trauma radio system response reduces cost and duration of evaluation of the injured patient.

Authors:  S J Gerndt; J L Conley; M J Lowell; J Holmes; E Marsh; L R Larin; P A Taheri; T Z Polley; J L Rodriquez
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: a survey of paramedics.

Authors:  M Gausche; D P Henderson; J S Seidel
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  10 in total

1.  The informatics response in disaster, terrorism, and war.

Authors:  Jonathan M Teich; Michael M Wagner; Colin F Mackenzie; Klaus O Schafer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Accuracy of emergency medical dispatchers' subjective ability to identify when higher dispatch levels are warranted over a Medical Priority Dispatch System automated protocol's recommended coding based on paramedic outcome data.

Authors:  Jeff Clawson; Christopher H O Olola; Andy Heward; Greg Scott; Brett Patterson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  [Trauma centre admission of severely injured or critically ill patients: comparison of estimated and real arrival times].

Authors:  T Wurmb; H Jansen; M Böttcher; M Kredel; C Wunder; A Gehrmann; N Roewer; R Muellenbach
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Optimized resource mobilization and quality of treatment of severely injured patients through a structured trauma room alarm system].

Authors:  C Spering; M Roessler; T Kurlemann; K Dresing; K M Stürmer; W Lehmann; S Sehmisch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Ambulance alerting to hospital: the need for clearer guidance.

Authors:  E Brown; A Bleetman
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A survey of trauma alert criteria and handover practice in England and Wales.

Authors:  Henry Robert Budd; Lawrence Maximilian Almond; Keith Porter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Supporting information use and retention of pre-hospital information during trauma resuscitation: a qualitative study of pre-hospital communications and information needs.

Authors:  Zhan Zhang; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Randall S Burd
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

8.  Physiological-social scores in predicting outcomes of prehospital internal patients.

Authors:  Abbasali Ebrahimian; Hesam Seyedin; Roohangiz Jamshidi-Orak; Gholamreza Masoumi
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 1.112

9.  The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary testing of a novel, low-tech intervention to improve pre-hospital data recording for pre-alert and handover to the Emergency Department.

Authors:  David Fitzpatrick; Douglas Maxwell; Alan Craigie
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-25

10.  Outcomes following resuscitative thoracotomy for abdominal exsanguination, a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Hughes; Zane Perkins
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.