Literature DB >> 11434959

Manipulating cattle distribution with salt and water in large arid-land pastures: a GPS/GIS assessment.

D Ganskopp1.   

Abstract

Several of the problems associated with grazing animals in extensive settings are related to their uneven patterns of use across the landscape. After fencing, water and salt are two of the most frequently used tools for affecting cattle distribution in extensive settings. Cattle are attracted to water in arid regions, but mixed results have been obtained with salt and mineral supplements. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacies of salt and water manipulations for affecting cattle distribution in large (>825ha) pastures. This was accomplished by fitting cattle with global positioning system (GPS) collars and monitoring their travels and activities in a three pasture, Latin-square design where water and salt shared a common location and water or salt were moved individually to distant areas. Mean distance of cattle from water (&xmacr;=1.16km) was unaffected by treatments (P=0.79) suggesting that cattle followed movements of water tanks. Distance traveled daily (&xmacr;=5.78km), time devoted to grazing (11.0h per day), time devoted to resting (10.1h per day), and the area (&xmacr;=325ha) of minimum convex polygons were also unaffected by treatment implying that cattle did not compensate for separated water and salting areas with increased travels or disruptions of habitual grazing and resting activities. Centers of activity for cattle shifted further (P=0.02) when water (&xmacr;=1.49km) was moved than when salt (&xmacr;=1.00km) was relocated. Mean distance of cattle from salt increased from 1.03km, when salt and water were together, to 1.73km (P=0.08) when salt and water were separated. This implied that cattle made less effort to remain near salt. Also, when water and salt were separated, cattle were found within 250m of water 354 times and close to salt only 38 times. Movement of drinking water to distant points in pastures was the most effective tool for altering cattle distribution. When cattle and salt were introduced to a new portion of a pasture, cattle used the new area for about 2 days, and then began drifting back toward previously used portions of the pasture. Manipulations of salting stations will not significantly rectify serious livestock distribution problems in extensive arid-land pastures.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11434959     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00148-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  9 in total

1.  Soil-extractable phosphorus and phosphorus saturation threshold in beef cattle pastures as affected by grazing management and forage type.

Authors:  Gilbert C Sigua; Chad C Chase; Joseph Albano
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Groundwater phosphorus in forage-based landscape with cow-calf operation.

Authors:  Gilbert C Sigua; Chad C Chase
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Quantifying phosphorus levels in soils, plants, surface water, and shallow groundwater associated with bahiagrass-based pastures.

Authors:  Gilbert C Sigua; Robert K Hubbard; Samuel W Coleman
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Inference of the activity timeline of cattle foraging on a Mediterranean woodland using GPS and pedometry.

Authors:  Eugene D Ungar; Iris Schoenbaum; Zalmen Henkin; Amit Dolev; Yehuda Yehuda; Arieh Brosh
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Inferring behavioral states of grazing livestock from high-frequency position data alone.

Authors:  Hermel Homburger; Manuel K Schneider; Sandra Hilfiker; Andreas Lüscher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Effect of Grazing Intensity and Sward Heterogeneity on the Movement Behavior of Suckler Cows on Semi-natural Grassland.

Authors:  Dina Hamidi; Martin Komainda; Bettina Tonn; Jens Harbers; Natascha Alexandria Grinnell; Johannes Isselstein
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 7.  Factors Affecting Site Use Preference of Grazing Cattle Studied from 2000 to 2020 through GPS Tracking: A Review.

Authors:  M Jordana Rivero; Patricia Grau-Campanario; Siobhan Mullan; Suzanne D E Held; Jessica E Stokes; Michael R F Lee; Laura M Cardenas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Assessing herbivore foraging behavior with GPS collars in a semiarid grassland.

Authors:  David J Augustine; Justin D Derner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Patterns of livestock activity on heterogeneous subalpine pastures reveal distinct responses to spatial autocorrelation, environment and management.

Authors:  Hermel Homburger; Andreas Lüscher; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Manuel K Schneider
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.