BACKGROUND:Lifestyle changes involving diet, behavior, and physical activity are the cornerstone of successful weight control. Incorporating meal replacements (1-2 per day) into traditional lifestyle interventions may offer an additional strategy for overweight patients in the primary care setting. METHODS:One hundred thirteen overweight premenopausal women (mean +/- SD age, 40.4 +/- 5.5 years; weight, 82 +/- 10 kg; and body mass index, 30 +/- 3 kg/m(2)) participated in a 1-year weight-reduction study consisting of 26 sessions. The women were randomly assigned to 3 different traditional lifestyle-based groups: (1) dietitian-led group intervention (1 hour per session), (2) dietitian-led group intervention incorporating meal replacements (1 hour per session), or (3) primary care office intervention incorporating meal replacements with individual physician and nurse visits (10-15 minutes per visit). RESULTS: For the 74 subjects (65%) completing 1 year, the primary care office intervention using meal replacements was as effective as the traditional dietitian-led group intervention not using meal replacements (mean +/- SD weight loss, 4.3% +/- 6.5% vs 4.1% +/- 6.4%, respectively). Comparison of the dietitian-led groups showed that women using meal replacements maintained a significantly greater weight loss (9.1% +/- 8.9% vs 4.1% +/- 6.4%) (P =.03). Analysis across groups showed that weight loss of 5% to 10% was associated with significant (P =.01) reduction in percentage of body fat, body mass index, waist circumference, resting energy expenditure, insulin level, total cholesterol level, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Weight loss of 10% or greater was associated with additional significant (P =.05) improvements in blood pressure and triglyceride level. CONCLUSIONS: A traditional lifestyle intervention using meal replacements can be effective for weight control and reduction in risk of chronic disease in the physician's office setting as well as in the dietitian-led group setting.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle changes involving diet, behavior, and physical activity are the cornerstone of successful weight control. Incorporating meal replacements (1-2 per day) into traditional lifestyle interventions may offer an additional strategy for overweight patients in the primary care setting. METHODS: One hundred thirteen overweight premenopausal women (mean +/- SD age, 40.4 +/- 5.5 years; weight, 82 +/- 10 kg; and body mass index, 30 +/- 3 kg/m(2)) participated in a 1-year weight-reduction study consisting of 26 sessions. The women were randomly assigned to 3 different traditional lifestyle-based groups: (1) dietitian-led group intervention (1 hour per session), (2) dietitian-led group intervention incorporating meal replacements (1 hour per session), or (3) primary care office intervention incorporating meal replacements with individual physician and nurse visits (10-15 minutes per visit). RESULTS: For the 74 subjects (65%) completing 1 year, the primary care office intervention using meal replacements was as effective as the traditional dietitian-led group intervention not using meal replacements (mean +/- SD weight loss, 4.3% +/- 6.5% vs 4.1% +/- 6.4%, respectively). Comparison of the dietitian-led groups showed that women using meal replacements maintained a significantly greater weight loss (9.1% +/- 8.9% vs 4.1% +/- 6.4%) (P =.03). Analysis across groups showed that weight loss of 5% to 10% was associated with significant (P =.01) reduction in percentage of body fat, body mass index, waist circumference, resting energy expenditure, insulin level, total cholesterol level, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Weight loss of 10% or greater was associated with additional significant (P =.05) improvements in blood pressure and triglyceride level. CONCLUSIONS: A traditional lifestyle intervention using meal replacements can be effective for weight control and reduction in risk of chronic disease in the physician's office setting as well as in the dietitian-led group setting.
Authors: Kate Lambourne; Richard A Washburn; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Jeannine Goetz; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: L T Ptomey; E A Willis; J R Goetz; J Lee; A N Szabo-Reed; D K Sullivan; J E Donnelly Journal: J Hum Nutr Diet Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 3.089
Authors: Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Jeanne M Clark; Karen E Emmons; Reneé H Moore; Gary G Bennett; Erica T Warner; David B Sarwer; Gerald J Jerome; Edgar R Miller; Sheri Volger; Thomas A Louis; Barbara Wells; Thomas A Wadden; Graham A Colditz; Lawrence J Appel Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Pamela D Martin; Gareth R Dutton; Paula C Rhode; Ronald L Horswell; Donna H Ryan; Phillip J Brantley Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Andrew C Pool; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Lindsay A Cover; Erik B Lehman; Heather L Stuckey; Kevin O Hwang; Kathryn I Pollak; Christopher N Sciamanna Journal: Obes Res Clin Pract Date: 2014 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.288