Literature DB >> 11434499

Two cheers for P-values?

S Senn1.   

Abstract

P-values are a practical success but a critical failure. Scientists the world over use them, but scarcely a statistician can be found to defend them. Bayesians in particular find them ridiculous, but even the modern frequentist has little time for them. In this essay, I consider what, if anything, might be said in their favour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11434499     DOI: 10.1080/135952201753172953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat        ISSN: 1359-5229


  10 in total

1.  On Causal Inferences for Personalized Medicine: How Hidden Causal Assumptions Led to Erroneous Causal Claims About the D-Value.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Michael P Fay; Erica H Brittain; Joanna H Shih; Dean A Follmann; Erin E Gabriel; James M Robins
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 8.710

2.  For and Against Methodologies: Some Perspectives on Recent Causal and Statistical Inference Debates.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Tests of Statistical Significance Made Sound.

Authors:  Brian D Haig
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Using Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials in Economic Models: What Information is Relevant and is There a Minimum Amount of Sample Data Required to Make Decisions?

Authors:  John W Stevens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?

Authors:  Deborah G Mayo; David Hand
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 1.595

6.  The Heuristic Value of p in Inductive Statistical Inference.

Authors:  Joachim I Krueger; Patrick R Heck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-09

7.  Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors from a young senior editor.

Authors:  Evgenios Agathokleous
Journal:  J For Res (Harbin)       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.149

8.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

9.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Stephen J Senn; Kenneth J Rothman; John B Carlin; Charles Poole; Steven N Goodman; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Retract p < 0.005 and propose using JASP, instead.

Authors:  Jose D Perezgonzalez; M Dolores Frías-Navarro
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-12-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.