Literature DB >> 11434075

Variation in clinical preventive services.

L I Solberg1, T E Kottke, M L Brekke.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Preventive services are not delivered at optimal rates in primary care settings, and the literature suggests that a systems approach is key to improvement. Studying variation among clinics could help us to understand the extent of system use in practice. PRACTICE PATTERN EXAMINED: The proportion of patients who are up-to-date for preventive services in 44 primary care practices in the Midwest. PREVENTIVE SERVICES EXAMINED: Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, cholesterol testing, mammography, clinical breast examination, blood pressure measurement, influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, and advice on tobacco use. DATA SOURCE: 6830 patients surveyed after their clinic visit (response rate, 85%).
RESULTS: The proportion of patients up-to-date for preventive services varied widely among clinics. For example, up-to-date rates for Pap smear testing ranged from 70% to 93% and 45% to 88% for cholesterol screening. There was little correlation between a clinic's performance on one preventive service (relative to the other 43 clinics) and its performance on others. When correlations between pairs of up-to-date rates within clinics were examined, only 4 of 28 service pairs were positive and statistically significant and only 1 had a correlation coefficient that exceeded 0.5 (for mammography and clinical breast examination).
CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the rates at which various preventive services are performed, both between and within clinics. This variation, which is probably due to a lack of organized prevention systems that cover multiple services, provides a clear target for improvement efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11434075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eff Clin Pract        ISSN: 1099-8128


  7 in total

1.  Preventive Care Quality of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations: Associations of Organizational Characteristics With Performance.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Valerie A Lewis; Joseph S Ross; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Rural, suburban, and urban differences in factors that impact physician adherence to clinical preventive service guidelines.

Authors:  Elaine C Khoong; Wesley S Gibbert; Jane M Garbutt; Walton Sumner; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Does Receiving Clinical Preventive Services Vary across Different Types of Primary Healthcare Organizations? Evidence from a Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Sylvie Provost; Raynald Pineault; Jean-Frédéric Levesque; Stéphane Groulx; Geneviève Baron; Danièle Roberge; Marjolaine Hamel
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-11

4.  Does patient-centered care improve provision of preventive services?

Authors:  Stephen D Flach; Kimberly D McCoy; Thomas E Vaughn; Marcia M Ward; Bonnie J Bootsmiller; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Screening strategies for cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Margaret L Wallace; Jason A Ricco; Bruce Barrett
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.907

6.  Patient acceptance and perceived utility of pre-consultation prevention summaries and reminders in general practice: pilot study.

Authors:  Oliver R Frank; Nigel P Stocks; Paul Aylward
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Variability in the performance of preventive services and in the degree of control of identified health problems: a primary care study protocol.

Authors:  Bonaventura Bolíbar; Clara Pareja; M Pilar Astier-Peña; Julio Morán; Teresa Rodríguez-Blanco; Magdalena Rosell-Murphy; Manuel Iglesias; Sebastián Juncosa; Juanjo Mascort; Concepció Violan; Rosa Magallón; Javier Apezteguia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.