Literature DB >> 11433169

Evaluating congenital spine deformities for intraspinal anomalies with magnetic resonance imaging.

S W Suh1, J F Sarwark, A Vora, B K Huang.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The incidence of intraspinal abnormalities associated with congenital spinal anomalies as detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming better defined. In this study, 41 nonrandomized children with congenital spinal deformities (excluding myelomeningocele) who underwent complete MR evaluation were reviewed. Of the 41 congenital spinal deformities, 37 demonstrated congenital scoliosis, with failure of formation in 19, failure of segmentation in 4, and mixed defects in 14. The remaining four deformities were cases of congenital kyphosis. Thirteen patients with congenital spine anomalies were noted to have intraspinal abnormalities identified by MRI: tethered cord in 12 patients, syringomyelia in 3 patients, and diastematomyelia in 5 patients. Of the 12 patients with tethered cord, 2 patients had neurologic deficits. Urorectal anomaly was one of the most common associated findings (15%). Considering an incidence of intraspinal anomalies of 31% and as clinical manifestations may not be initially detectable, MRI is recommended in patients with congenital spinal deformity as part of the initial evaluation even in the absence of clinical findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11433169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  19 in total

1.  Split cord malformation types I and II: a personal series of 131 patients.

Authors:  Yusuf Erşahin
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Vertebral, rib, and intraspinal anomalies in congenital scoliosis: a study on 202 Caucasians.

Authors:  Hassan Ghandhari; Hossein Vahid Tari; Ebrahim Ameri; Mir Bahram Safari; Daniel Fadaei Fouladi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reduced complication rate with simultaneous detethering and spinal deformity correction surgery compared to staged surgeries in patients with early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Jennifer Kunes; Theodore Quan; Rajiv Iyer; Adam N Fano; Hiroko Matsumoto; Mark Erickson; Richard McCarthy; Douglas Brockmeyer; Richard C E Anderson; Michael G Vitale
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Charles E Mackel; Ajit Jada; Amer F Samdani; James H Stephen; James T Bennett; Ali A Baaj; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Intraspinal anomalies in scoliosis: An MRI analysis of 177 consecutive scoliosis patients.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; Vijay Kamath; R Kiran; Ajoy Prasad Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Unilateral hyperplasia of the left posterior arch and associated vertebral schisis at C6 level.

Authors:  Giuseppe Esposito; Pasquale de Bonis; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Luca Massimi; Vadim Byvaltsev; Concezio di Rocco; Antonio Leone
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Treatment of congenital thoracic scoliosis with associated rib fusions using VEPTR expansion thoracostomy: a surgical technique.

Authors:  Romain Dayer; Dimitri Ceroni; Pierre Lascombes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Tethered cord syndrome secondary to the unusual constellation of a split cord malformation, lumbar myelomeningocele, and coexisting neurenteric cyst.

Authors:  Humphrey Okechi; A Leland Albright; Ancent Nzioka
Journal:  Case Rep Neurol Med       Date:  2012-09-06

9.  Vitamin A deficiency induces congenital spinal deformities in rats.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Jianxiong Shen; William Ka Kei Wu; Xiaojuan Wang; Jinqian Liang; Guixing Qiu; Jiaming Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Scoliotic deformity and asymptomatic cervical syrinx in a 9 year old with caudal regression syndrome.

Authors:  Ankur Singh; Seema Kapoor; Gaurav Pradhan; V K Gautam; Simmi K Ratan
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.