Literature DB >> 11433060

Barriers to domestic violence screening in the pediatric setting.

M J Erickson1, T D Hill, R M Siegel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: By surveying practitioners in our community, we hoped to determine what pediatricians and family physicians (FPs) perceive as barriers to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Recommendation on Domestic Violence Screening.
BACKGROUND: When screened in the pediatric setting, as many as 40% of mothers will disclose domestic violence (DV) by their partner. Recognizing the profound effects of DV on children, the AAP recently recommended that all practitioners incorporate DV screening as a part of routine anticipatory guidance. Yet, there is little information about whether pediatricians have the training, the time to screen, or understand the magnitude of this problem. DESIGN/
METHODS: A 22-question survey about attitudes, training, and current DV screening practice was sent to all general pediatricians and FPs with admitting privileges to Children's Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati, Ohio. A copy of the AAP recommendation on screening was included. The vast majority of practitioners with an appreciable pediatric practice in the surrounding tri-state area of 1.8 million people have privileges at the institution.
RESULTS: After 2 mailings, 310 (57%) of 547 of questionnaires were returned. The majority of practitioners (64%) were unaware of the AAP recommendation, but 51% of practitioners screened at least high-risk families for DV and 49% had identified a case of DV in their practice. Still, only 8.5% routinely screened for DV and 74% had received no specific DV training. Fifty-eight percent of practitioners estimated the incidence of DV to be <5% in their practice. The most commonly perceived barriers to screening were lack of education (61%), office protocol (60%), time (59%), and support staff (55%). FPs were significantly more likely to have DV training (64% vs 21%), more likely to screen at least high-risk women (79% vs 56%), and more likely to have identified a case of DV (92% vs 40%) than pediatricians. FPs were less likely to cite lack of education (46% vs 65%) and lack of time (50% vs 61%) than pediatricians. Physicians licensed in Ohio were less likely to have specific domestic violence training (23% vs 60%) as compared with Kentucky physicians, where domestic violence education is required for licensing. Kentucky physicians were less likely to cite lack of education as barrier to DV screening (20% vs 62%). When comparing the characteristics of those who screen to those who do not, those with DV training were 10.9 times (odds adjusted ratio) more likely to screen.
CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners grossly underestimate the incidence of DV in their practices. Lack of education including knowledge of screening recommendations is a barrier to DV screening by pediatricians. Greater efforts are needed to educate pediatricians on DV for the AAP recommendations to be accepted.domestic violence, child abuse, screening, physician attitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11433060     DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.1.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  22 in total

1.  Survivor of that time, that place: clinical uses of violence survivors' narratives.

Authors:  Chaya Bhuvaneswar; Audrey Shafer
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2004

2.  Trauma-Informed Personalized Scripts to Address Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Preliminary Findings from an Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Amber L Hill; Hadas Zachor; Kelley A Jones; Janine Talis; Sarah Zelazny; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Screening and intervention for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: creating sustainable system-level programs.

Authors:  L Kevin Hamberger; Karin Rhodes; Jeremy Brown
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  The safe environment for every kid model: impact on pediatric primary care professionals.

Authors:  Howard Dubowitz; Wendy G Lane; Joshua N Semiatin; Laurence S Magder; Mamata Venepally; Merel Jans
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Development of a brief mental health screen for intimate partner violence victims in the emergency department.

Authors:  Debra Houry; Robin S Kemball; Lorie A Click; Nadine J Kaslow
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 6.  Detection, diagnosis, and prevention of child abuse: the role of the pediatrician.

Authors:  Johan Marchand; Michel Deneyer; Yvan Vandenplas
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 7.  Screening children for family violence: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Peggy Nygren; Heidi D Nelson; Jonathan Klein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Intimate partner violence screening among migrant/seasonal farmworker women and healthcare: a policy brief.

Authors:  Jonathan B Wilson; Damon L Rappleyea; Jennifer L Hodgson; Tana L Hall; Mark B White
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-04

9.  What are parents worried about? Health problems and health concerns for children.

Authors:  Jane M Garbutt; Erin Leege; Randall Sterkel; Shannon Gentry; Michael Wallendorf; Robert C Strunk
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.168

10.  Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.

Authors:  Ping-Hsin Chen; Sue Rovi; Judy Washington; Abbie Jacobs; Marielos Vega; Ko-Yu Pan; Mark S Johnson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.