Literature DB >> 11432159

The hypoalgesic effect of 3-D video glasses on cold pressor pain: reproducibility and importance of information.

B Bentsen1, P Svensson, A Wenzel.   

Abstract

The first aim of the study was to evaluate whether it was possible to manipulate the distraction effect induced by 3-D video glasses on the perceived pain and unpleasantness of the subjects by giving them different information about the expected effect. Second, the study aimed to determine the reproducibility of the effect. Forty-five students enrolled, 39 students participated in the study (24 women and 15 men, median age 23 years, range 19-28 years) because 6 did not show up for the first trial, and 37 completed the study because 2 subjects did not show up for the second trial. The subjects were randomized into 3 groups, balanced with respect to age and sex, that received different information about the effect of 3-D video on pain and unpleasantness: the first group received positive information, the second group received neutral information, and the third group received negative information. Once assigned to a group, there were no crossovers between the groups. A cold pressor stimulus was used to induce experimental pain, and the volunteers rated the intensity of pain and unpleasantness on 100-mm visual analogue scales. A new generation of video glasses were used in the study. Each volunteer was exposed to the cold pressor test in 2 randomized trials (video and control) after the information was given, and the 2 trials were repeated in a second session after 4 weeks. There was no significant difference in the effect of video glasses on perceived pain (P = .74) nor on the perceived unpleasantness (P = .84) among the 3 information groups. The data were therefore pooled. The results of the pooled data showed a significant effect of 3-D video on perceived pain (P = .03) but not on unpleasantness (P = .18). After 4 weeks, the study was repeated, and there were no significant changes in the effect of video glasses. The median visual analogue scale scores were reduced in both the video and the control trials compared with the first session.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11432159      PMCID: PMC2149026     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  11 in total

1.  The effect of a new type of video glasses on the perceived intensity of pain and unpleasantness evoked by a cold pressor test.

Authors:  B Bentsen; P Svensson; A Wenzel
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1999

2.  Normative model for cold pressor test.

Authors:  N E Walsh; L Schoenfeld; S Ramamurthy; J Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Humor as a cognitive technique for increasing pain tolerance.

Authors:  Matisyohu Weisenberg; Inbal Tepper; Joseph Schwarzwald
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Pain measurement: an overview.

Authors:  C R Chapman; K L Casey; R Dubner; K M Foley; R H Gracely; A E Reading
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Drama-induced affect and pain sensitivity.

Authors:  D Zillmann; M de Wied; C King-Jablonski; S Jenzowsky
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  Relationship between noxious cold stimuli and the magnitude of pain sensation in man.

Authors:  S Chéry-Croze
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Morphine and ibuprofen compared using the cold pressor test.

Authors:  S F Jones; H J McQuay; R A Moore; C W Hand
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Efficacy of a topical anesthetic on pain and unpleasantness during scaling of gingival pockets.

Authors:  P Svensson; J K Petersen; H Svensson
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1994

9.  Use of video eyeglasses to decrease anxiety among children undergoing genital examinations.

Authors:  A B Berenson; C M Wiemann; V I Rickert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A dose-response study of the effects of intravenous midazolam on cold pressor-induced pain.

Authors:  J P Zacny; D Coalson; C Young; J Klafta; G Rupani; P Thapar; M Choi; J L Apfelbaum
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison between the analgesic effectiveness and patients' preference for virtual reality vs. topical anesthesia gel during the administration of local anesthesia in adult dental patients: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  May Almugait; Ammar AbuMostafa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.