Literature DB >> 11431225

Functional neuroanatomy of visuospatial working memory in fragile X syndrome: relation to behavioral and molecular measures.

H Kwon1, V Menon, S Eliez, I S Warsofsky, C D White, J Dyer-Friedman, A K Taylor, G H Glover, A L Reiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fragile X syndrome is a neurogenetic disorder that is the most common known heritable cause of neurodevelopmental disability. This study examined the neural substrates of working memory in female subjects with fragile X syndrome. Possible correlations among behavioral measures, brain activation, and the FMR1 gene product (FMRP expression), as well as between IQ and behavioral measures, were investigated.
METHOD: Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine visuospatial working memory in 10 female subjects with fragile X syndrome and 15 typically developing female subjects (ages 10-23 years). Subjects performed standard 1-back and 2-back visuospatial working memory tasks. Brain activation was examined in four regions of the cortex known to play a critical role in visuospatial working memory. Correlations between behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular measures were examined.
RESULTS: Relative to the comparison group, subjects with fragile X syndrome performed significantly worse on the 2-back task but not on the 1-back task. In a region-of-interest analysis focused on the inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, superior parietal lobule, and supramarginal gyrus, comparison subjects showed significantly increased brain activation between the 1-back and 2-back tasks, but subjects with fragile X syndrome showed no change in activation between the two tasks. Significant correlations were found in comparison subjects between activation in the frontal and parietal regions and the rate of correct responses on the 2-back task, but not on the 1-back task. In subjects with fragile X syndrome, significant correlations were found during the 2-back task between FMRP expression and activation in the right inferior and bilateral middle frontal gyri and the bilateral supramarginal gyri.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with fragile X syndrome are unable to modulate activation in the prefrontal and parietal cortex in response to an increasing working memory load, and these deficits are related to a lower level of FMRP expression in fragile X syndrome subjects than in normal comparison subjects. The observed correlations between biological markers and brain activation provide new evidence for links between gene expression and cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11431225     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  44 in total

1.  Discrimination learning and attentional set formation in a mouse model of Fragile X.

Authors:  Kimberly S Casten; Annette C Gray; Rebecca D Burwell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Moving Toward Integrative, Multidimensional Research in Modern Psychiatry: Lessons Learned From Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Lawrence K Fung; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 3.  Fragile X syndrome and targeted treatment trials.

Authors:  Randi Hagerman; Julie Lauterborn; Jacky Au; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2012

4.  Isolation of mouse neuritic mRNAs.

Authors:  Surya A Reis; Ben A Oostra; Rob Willemsen
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.611

5.  Continuous ASL perfusion fMRI investigation of higher cognition: quantification of tonic CBF changes during sustained attention and working memory tasks.

Authors:  Junghoon Kim; John Whyte; Jiongjiong Wang; Hengyi Rao; Kathy Z Tang; John A Detre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neural basis of protracted developmental changes in visuo-spatial working memory.

Authors:  H Kwon; A L Reiss; V Menon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Outcome measures for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; David Hessl; Leonard Abbeduto; Allan L Reiss; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; Tiina K Urv
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.225

Review 9.  Gene, brain, and behavior relationships in fragile X syndrome: evidence from neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Oxytocin and vasopressin systems in genetic syndromes and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  S M Francis; A Sagar; T Levin-Decanini; W Liu; C S Carter; S Jacob
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.