Literature DB >> 11430967

Early feeding after cesarean: randomized trial.

D S Patolia1, R L Hilliard, E C Toy, B Baker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the rate of ileus symptoms and hospital course of women who are offered solid food shortly after cesarean delivery.
METHODS: This study involved women delivered by cesarean under regional anesthesia. Exclusion criteria included general anesthesia, magnesium sulfate, intra-operative bowel injury or bowel surgery, or other conditions that precluded early feeding. Early-fed women were offered regular diets within 8 hours of surgery, and controls were given nothing by mouth for 12-24 hours, advanced to clear liquids on the first postoperative day, and then given solid food on the second or third postoperative day.
RESULTS: Sixty women were assigned randomly to each method. Early-fed women received solid food sooner after surgery, 5.0 +/- 1.2 hours versus 40.0 +/- 10.6 hours. The incidences of mild ileus symptoms and postoperative complications were similar in both groups; however, the study did not have an adequate sample size to definitively assess safety concerns. Women in the early-fed group had shorter hospital stays (49.5 +/- 12.7 hours versus 75.0 +/- 12.3 hours, P <.001), and shorter time intervals from surgery to bowel movement, 34.5 hours (interquartile range 25.3-48.8) versus 51.0 (43.3-62.0) hours, P <.001. In the early-fed group, women whose operative times exceeded 40 minutes were more likely to have symptoms of mild ileus.
CONCLUSION: Early initiation of solid food after cesarean delivery appears to be well tolerated and may be associated with a shorter hospital stay. Early-fed women whose operations exceed 40 minutes may be more likely to have mild ileus symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430967     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01387-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey.

Authors:  Ryash Vather; Sid Trivedi; Ian Bissett
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Postoperative management and restrictions for female pelvic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Cedric Olivera; Thomas Wheeler; Elizabeth Casiano; Nazema Siddiqui; Rajiv Gala; Tondalaya Gamble; Ethan M Balk; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  [Effects of Early Oral Feeding versus Delayed Oral Feeding on Bowel Function, Gastrointestinal Complications and Surgical Recovery after Cesarean Section under Regional Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis].

Authors:  HyoJin Kim; YeongKyung Jeon; SoYoung Yoon; GeumMoon Lee
Journal:  J Korean Acad Nurs       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 0.984

Review 4.  Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section.

Authors:  L Mangesi; G J Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

5.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy of ginger in the prevention of abdominal distention in post cesarean section patients.

Authors:  Wasinee Tianthong; Vorapong Phupong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Early Versus Delayed Oral Feeding after Uncomplicated Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Adamu O Ogbadua; Teddy E Agida; Godwin O Akaba; Olumide A Akitoye; Bissallah A Ekele
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun

7.  Comparing Formation or Non-Formation of Bladder Flap at Cesarean Section on Perioperative and Postoperative Complications: Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Farideh Akhlaghi; Azadeh Khazaie; Fateme Jafaripour
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2017-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.