Literature DB >> 11430948

Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction.

S Chandra1, J M Crane, D Hutchens, D C Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare transvaginal ultrasound and digital cervical examination in predicting successful induction in post-term pregnancy.
METHODS: Transvaginal ultrasound and digital vaginal examinations were performed on 122 women at 41 or more weeks' gestation, immediately before labor induction. Ultrasound assessments of cervical length, dilatation, and presence of funneling were compared with the components of the Bishop score. The primary outcome was the rate of vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes assessed included the rates of active labor in 12 hours, vaginal delivery in 12 and 24 hours, mean duration of latent phase, and induction to vaginal delivery interval. Linear and multiple logistic regression models were generated to identify factors independently associated with successful induction.
RESULTS: No ultrasound characteristic predicted primary or secondary outcomes. Bishop score (odds ratio [OR] 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71, 5.20), cervical position (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.41, 12.50), and maternal age (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01, 1.30) independently predicted vaginal delivery. Maternal weight (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94, 0.98), cervical dilatation (OR 6.08, 95% CI 1.70, 21.68), and effacement (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.16, 4.73) independently predicted active labor in 12 hours. Independent predictors of vaginal delivery in 12 hours were induction method (P <.001), cervical dilatation (OR 11.16, 95% CI 3.17, 39.29), gravidity (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.13, 3.77), and maternal weight (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93, 0.99). Cervical effacement (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.59, 4.57) and parity (OR 7.10, 95% CI 2.22, 22.72) independently predicted vaginal delivery in 24 hours. Maternal weight, cervical position, and cervical dilatation were independently associated with latent phase labor duration. Factors independently associated with length of induction to delivery interval were parity, cervical effacement, and maternal weight.
CONCLUSION: Transvaginal ultrasound does not predict successful labor induction in post-term pregnancy as well as digital cervical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430948     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01386-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  Manipal Cervical Scoring System by Transvaginal Ultrasound in Predicting Successful Labour Induction.

Authors:  Neha Bajpai; Rajesh Bhakta; Pratap Kumar; Lavanya Rai; Shripad Hebbar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 2.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

3.  Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with Bishop score for predicting cesarean section after induction of labor.

Authors:  Parvin Bastani; Kobra Hamdi; Fatemeh Abasalizadeh; Parisa Pourmousa; Fatemeh Ghatrehsamani
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-08-12

4.  Aspiration technique-based device is more reliable in cervical stiffness assessment than digital palpation.

Authors:  Sabrina Badir; Laura Bernardi; Francisco Feijó Delgado; Katharina Quack Loetscher; Gundula Hebisch; Irene Hoesli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Zainab Hananah Abang Abdullah; Kah Teik Chew; V Ramesh V Velayudham; Zainab Yahaya; Amilia Afzan Mohd Jamil; Muhammad Azrai Abu; Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani; Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan.

Authors:  Rawan A Obeidat; Mahmoud Almaaitah; Abeer Ben-Sadon; Dina Istaiti; Hasan Rawashdeh; Shereen Hamadneh; Hanan Hammouri; Adel Bataineh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Kyo Hoon Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Clinical parameters for prediction of successful labor induction after application of intravaginal dinoprostone in nulliparous Chinese women.

Authors:  Lei Hou; Yu Zhu; Xiaomin Ma; Jianing Li; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-08

9.  The Effect of Ultrasound-Measured Preinduction Cervical Length on Delivery Outcome in a Low-Resource Setting.

Authors:  Chidebe C Anikwe; Bartholomew C Okorochukwu; Emmanuel Uchendu; Cyril C Ikeoha
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2020-05-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.