M Ragaller1, J Bleyl, U Tschö, T Winkler, M Regner, S Rasche, T Koch, M Albrecht. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Dresden, Germany. ragaller@rcs.urz.tu-dresden.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of PFC aerosol compared to PGI2 aerosol and NaCl aerosol on gas exchange and lung mechanics in oleic acid-induced acute lung injury. DESIGN: A prospective, controlled, randomised, in vivo animal laboratory study. SETTING: Research laboratory at an university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty one (n = 21) adult sheep of either gender weighing 26.8+/-6.4 kg. INTERVENTIONS: The animals were randomised to three groups: PFC aerosol (perfluorooctane), PFC group; prostacyclin aerosol (Flolan), PGI2 group; and NaCl aerosol (0.9% sodium chloride solution), control group. After induction of anaesthesia and placement of vascular catheters, lung injury was induced with 0.12 ml x kg(-1) oleic acid. Aerosols were continuously administered for 2 h using a jet nebuliser. Gas exchange, pulmonary mechanic, and haemodynamic parameters were obtained at regular intervals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PFC aerosol increased oxygenation (PaO2) 15 min after the initiation of treatment up to 120 min (P < 0.05). Transpulmonary shunt improved in the PFC group (P < 0.05) while it did not change in the two other groups. PFC aerosol reduced maximum airway pressure (Pmax) (median) significantly from (median) 38 mbar to 32 mbar (P < 0.05). Static compliance improved significantly in the PFC group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The inhalation of a PFC aerosol led to a significant improvement in pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange, which was not observed in the other two groups. These data suggest that a small dose of perfluorocarbon will have beneficial effects on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. Therefore, the non-invasive aerosol application technique seems to be a reasonable alternative to administer perfluorocarbons in severe lung injury.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of PFC aerosol compared to PGI2 aerosol and NaCl aerosol on gas exchange and lung mechanics in oleic acid-induced acute lung injury. DESIGN: A prospective, controlled, randomised, in vivo animal laboratory study. SETTING: Research laboratory at an university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty one (n = 21) adult sheep of either gender weighing 26.8+/-6.4 kg. INTERVENTIONS: The animals were randomised to three groups: PFC aerosol (perfluorooctane), PFC group; prostacyclin aerosol (Flolan), PGI2 group; and NaCl aerosol (0.9% sodium chloride solution), control group. After induction of anaesthesia and placement of vascular catheters, lung injury was induced with 0.12 ml x kg(-1) oleic acid. Aerosols were continuously administered for 2 h using a jet nebuliser. Gas exchange, pulmonary mechanic, and haemodynamic parameters were obtained at regular intervals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:PFC aerosol increased oxygenation (PaO2) 15 min after the initiation of treatment up to 120 min (P < 0.05). Transpulmonary shunt improved in the PFC group (P < 0.05) while it did not change in the two other groups. PFC aerosol reduced maximum airway pressure (Pmax) (median) significantly from (median) 38 mbar to 32 mbar (P < 0.05). Static compliance improved significantly in the PFC group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The inhalation of a PFC aerosol led to a significant improvement in pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange, which was not observed in the other two groups. These data suggest that a small dose of perfluorocarbon will have beneficial effects on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. Therefore, the non-invasive aerosol application technique seems to be a reasonable alternative to administer perfluorocarbons in severe lung injury.
Authors: Peter M Spieth; Lilla Knels; Michael Kasper; André Domingues Quelhas; Bärbel Wiedemann; Amelie Lupp; Matthias Hübler; Antonio Giannella Neto; Antonio Gianella Neto; Thea Koch; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-11-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J-U Bleyl; U Tschö; M Regner; O Vicent; M Hübler; M G de Abreu; T Koch; D M Albrecht; M Ragaller Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Travis Beckett; Laura Bonneau; Alan Howard; James Blanchard; Juan Borda; Daniel J Weiner; Lili Wang; Guang Ping Gao; Jay K Kolls; Rudolf Bohm; Denny Liggitt; Daniel J Weiss Journal: Hum Gene Ther Methods Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 2.396
Authors: Constantin J C Trepte; Charles R Phillips; Josep Solà; Andy Adler; Sebastian A Haas; Michael Rapin; Stephan H Böhm; Daniel A Reuter Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 9.097