Literature DB >> 11429420

UK NEQAS for leucocyte immunophenotyping: the first 10 years.

J T Reilly1, D Barnett.   

Abstract

In the past decade, cellular immunophenotyping has become a new discipline in diagnostic haematology and immunology, and is invaluable in the rapid diagnosis of leukaemia and monitoring disease progression in human immunodeficiency virus infected individuals. The introduction of bench top flow cytometers has meant that immunophenotyping is now also used for the quantitation of CD34(+) peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) to ensure the correct timing and adequacy of haematopoietic progenitor cell harvests. Furthermore, flow cytometry has become an important tool for the counting of leucocytes in blood components after leucocyte depletion. Because this new discipline is now such a major diagnostic and prognostic tool in the clinical arena, its use must be subject to both internal and external quality control. Such a requirement was first recognised as early as 1986 when an Inter-Regional Quality Assessment Scheme (IRQAS) was initiated for laboratories that undertook the immunocytochemical diagnosis of leukaemia using the alkaline phosphates anti-alkaline phosphatase technique. This programme began with around 25 UK laboratories. In 1990, after the introduction of two more programmes (one for leukaemia diagnosis using UV microscopy and latterly flow cytometry, and one for the enumeration of CD4(+) T cells) the IRQAS achieved UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) status and changed its title to UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping. In the past decade the once small IRQAS programme has evolved into the largest international scheme of its kind, providing EQA to over 650 laboratories world wide for leukaemia immunophenotyping, lymphocyte subset analysis, PBSCs, and more recently low level leucocyte counting. Over the years, this EQA programme has highlighted important problems, such as the inappropriate use of fluorochromes and antibody titre, and the identification of effective gating strategies, all of which have contributed directly to the high interlaboratory variations seen in cellular immunophenotyping. Furthermore, particularly in absolute counting of lymphocyte subsets, PBSCs, and the enumeration of low numbers of leucocytes, UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping programmes have been instrumental in highlighting the differences that occur between single and dual platform flow cytometric technologies. As a result of these findings, UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping has helped to reduce the variation seen on an interlaboratory basis and enabled greater standardisation both in the UK and internationally. These advances have been attributable to the development, by UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, of a unique whole blood stabilising process that ensures the retention of the physical characteristics (both light scatter and antigenic profile) required of cells to ensure successful cellular immunophenotyping. This major technological advancement has enabled the distribution of specimens for EQA purposes on a global scale that have minimal matrix effect and behave in a manner identical to fresh blood for several months after stabilisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11429420      PMCID: PMC1731480          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.54.7.508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  16 in total

1.  Analysis of variation in results of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell enumeration in a multicenter study.

Authors:  J W Gratama; J Kraan; W Levering; D R Van Bockstaele; G T Rijkers; C E Van der Schoot
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1997-06-15

2.  Effect of type of haematology analyser on CD4 count.

Authors:  G Robinson; L Morgan; M Evans; S McDermott; S Pereira; M Wansbrough-Jones; G Griffin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-08-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Quality assessment of CD34+ stem cell enumeration: experience of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) using a unique stable whole blood preparation.

Authors:  D Barnett; V Granger; I Storie; J Peel; R Pollitt; T Smart; J T Reilly
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  How should CD34+ cells be analysed? A study of three classes of antibody and five leucocyte preparation procedures.

Authors:  M G Macey; D A McCarthy; A van Agthoven; A C Newland
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1997-05-26       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  The influence of flow cytometric gating strategy on the standardization of CD34+ cell quantitation: an Australian multicenter study. Australasian BMT Scientists Study Group.

Authors:  A Chang; D D Ma
Journal:  J Hematother       Date:  1996-12

Review 6.  Use and evaluation of leucocyte monoclonal antibodies in the diagnostic laboratory: a review.

Authors:  J T Reilly
Journal:  Clin Lab Haematol       Date:  1996-03

Review 7.  CD34: structure, biology, and clinical utility.

Authors:  D S Krause; M J Fackler; C I Civin; W S May
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Assessment of interlaboratory variability of immunophenotyping. Results of the College of American Pathologists Flow Cytometry Survey.

Authors:  H A Homburger; W Rosenstock; H Paxton; M L Paton; A L Landay
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of acute leukaemias. General Haematology Task Force of BCSH.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Laboratory practices in reporting flow cytometry phenotyping results for leukemia/lymphoma specimens: results of a survey.

Authors:  J Hassett; J Parker
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1995-12-15
View more
  7 in total

1.  Laboratory Accuracy Improvement in the UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping Immune Monitoring Program: An Eleven-Year Review via Longitudinal Mixed Effects Modeling.

Authors:  John Bainbridge; Wes Rountree; Raul Louzao; John Wong; Liam Whitby; Thomas N Denny; David Barnett
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.058

2.  Microsatellite instability and protein expression of MLH1 and MSH2 genes in young Mexican patients less than 50 years of age diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Arturo Quintanilla-Guzman; Arturo Luevano-Gonzalez; Ada Nayeli Rangel-Gomez; Augusto Rojas-Martinez; Raquel Garza-Guajardo; Oralia Barboza-Quintana; Jesus Ancer-Rodriguez; Clara Patricia Rios-Ibarra; Rocio Ortiz-Lopez
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  Quality assurance in the HIV/AIDS laboratory network of China.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; Maofeng Qiu; Guiyun Zhang; Wenge Xing; Yao Xiao; Pinliang Pan; Jun Yao; Chin-Yih Ou; Xueli Su
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  The potential of proliferative and apoptotic parameters in clinical flow cytometry of myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Stefan G C Mestrum; Anton H N Hopman; Frans C S Ramaekers; Math P G Leers
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-04-13

5.  Performance evaluation of the Pima™ point-of-care CD4 analyser using capillary blood sampling in field tests in South Africa.

Authors:  Deborah K Glencross; Lindi M Coetzee; Mamsallah Faal; Martin Masango; Wendy S Stevens; Wd Francois Venter; Regina Osih
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  External Quality Assessment on CD4+ T-Cell Count Using in-House Proficiency Testing Panels for CD4 Count Laboratories in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Natnael Kidanu Yibalih; Dawit Wolday; Samuel Kinde; Gebru Mulugeta Weldearegay
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2019-05

Review 7.  The influence of fixation of biological samples on cell count and marker expression stability in flow cytometric analyses.

Authors:  Łukasz SĘdek; Jan Kulis; Łukasz SŁota; Magdalena Twardoch; Magdalena Pierzyna-ŚwitaŁa; Bartosz Perkowski; Tomasz SzczepaŃski
Journal:  Cent Eur J Immunol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.085

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.