Literature DB >> 11429363

A comparison of 1% prilocaine with 0.5% ropivacaine for outpatient-based surgery under axillary brachial plexus block.

P R Janzen1, A J Vipond, D J Bush, P M Hopkins.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared the use of 1% prilocaine with 0.5% ropivacaine for axillary brachial plexus anesthesia in a double-blinded manner in day-stay patients to determine the better of the two local anesthetics in terms of onset time and duration of motor block. Sixty patients scheduled for outpatient upper-limb surgery were allocated randomly to receive either prilocaine (28 patients) or ropivacaine (32 patients) at a volume of 0.7 mL/kg. The brachial plexus was located with a plexus needle and nerve stimulator. By 20 min after injection of prilocaine or ropivacaine, there was no difference in analgesic effect. By this time, it was apparent whether or not a block was going to be adequate for surgery. Pain returned after a mean of 278 min (SD 111 min; range, 160-630 min) with prilocaine as compared with 636 min (SD 284 min; range, 210-1440 min) with ropivacaine. Analgesia use was similar in both groups. Duration of motor block with prilocaine was a mean of 254 min (SD 62 min; range, 130-385 min), as compared with 642 min (SD 199 min; range, 350-1080 min) with ropivacaine. We conclude that there is no clinically important difference between 1% prilocaine and 0.5% ropivacaine in time to onset of axillary brachial plexus block when they are injected in equal volumes. There is a significantly longer duration of action with ropivacaine, which may make it less suitable for day-stay upper-limb surgery because of the handicap from reduced muscle power. IMPLICATIONS: This study compares two local anesthetics to determine which is most suitable for day-stay upper-limb surgery under axillary brachial plexus block. Prilocaine 1% is more suitable than ropivacaine 0.5% because of a more prolonged duration of action of ropivacaine, although this could be useful in other circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11429363     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200107000-00037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of the onset time of complete blockade of the sciatic nerve in the application of ropivacaine and its equal volumes mixture with lidocaine: a double-blind randomized study.

Authors:  Piacherski Valery; Marochkov Aliaksei
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-07-19

2.  A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block.

Authors:  Simon H Armanious; Gamal A Abdelhameed
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-09-24

Review 3.  [Ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia : placement and dosage of local anesthetics].

Authors:  G Gorsewski; A Dinse-Lambracht; I Tugtekin; A Gauss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Differential axillary nerve block for hand or forearm soft-tissue surgery.

Authors:  Natsumi Kii; Masanori Yamauchi; Kazunobu Takahashi; Michiaki Yamakage; Takuro Wada
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Prolonged Analgesic Efficacy of Articaine with the Addition of Tramadol in Axillary Brachial Plexus Block.

Authors:  Leyla Kilinc; Surhan Cinar; Hacer Sebnem Turk
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2019-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.