L M Pope1, N E Adler, J M Tschann. 1. Department of Family Practice and Health Psychology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether younger adolescents experience greater adverse psychological outcomes after abortion than those aged 18-21 years, whether abortion places all adolescents at risk for negative sequelae, and what factors predict negative outcomes. METHODS: A total of 96 young women aged 14-21 years seeking counseling for unwanted pregnancies at four clinics completed questionnaires after counseling. These included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), an emotion scale, questions regarding sociodemographic and reproductive background, feelings about pregnancy, and decision-making. Sixty-three respondents were reinterviewed 4 weeks postabortion and completed the BDI, emotion scale, Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Impact of Events Scale, and Positive States of Mind Scale. Chi-squares and Student's t-tests were used to compare: (a) responses of adolescents under 18 years of age with those 18-21 years, (b) preabortion and postabortion responses, and (c) the current sample with other samples of adolescents. RESULTS: Adolescents under age 18 years were less comfortable with their decision, but showed no other differences compared with those aged 18-21 years. Both groups showed significant improvement in psychological responses postabortion. Postabortion scores did not differ significantly from those of other adolescent samples reported in the literature. Preabortion emotional state and perception of partner pressure predicted postabortion response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its legal significance, age 18 years was not a meaningful cutoff point for psychological response to abortion in this sample. There was no evidence that abortion poses a threat to adolescents' psychological well-being.
PURPOSE: To assess whether younger adolescents experience greater adverse psychological outcomes after abortion than those aged 18-21 years, whether abortion places all adolescents at risk for negative sequelae, and what factors predict negative outcomes. METHODS: A total of 96 young women aged 14-21 years seeking counseling for unwanted pregnancies at four clinics completed questionnaires after counseling. These included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), an emotion scale, questions regarding sociodemographic and reproductive background, feelings about pregnancy, and decision-making. Sixty-three respondents were reinterviewed 4 weeks postabortion and completed the BDI, emotion scale, Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Impact of Events Scale, and Positive States of Mind Scale. Chi-squares and Student's t-tests were used to compare: (a) responses of adolescents under 18 years of age with those 18-21 years, (b) preabortion and postabortion responses, and (c) the current sample with other samples of adolescents. RESULTS: Adolescents under age 18 years were less comfortable with their decision, but showed no other differences compared with those aged 18-21 years. Both groups showed significant improvement in psychological responses postabortion. Postabortion scores did not differ significantly from those of other adolescent samples reported in the literature. Preabortion emotional state and perception of partner pressure predicted postabortion response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its legal significance, age 18 years was not a meaningful cutoff point for psychological response to abortion in this sample. There was no evidence that abortion poses a threat to adolescents' psychological well-being.