Literature DB >> 11429013

Amphotericin B preparations: a maximum tolerated dose in severe invasive fungal infections?

M Ellis1.   

Abstract

Availability of lipid formulations of amphotericin B has opened up the possibility of treating invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with high doses of this antifungal agent. Evidence is emerging to suggest that lipid formulations may have heightened efficacy compared to conventional amphotericin B. The issue of optimal dosage has been a neglected area. This article reviews published data accrued from clinical, open-label, salvage, and other studies, and finds little support that the use of high doses of lipid formulations are more efficacious than lower doses. The response rates for invasive fungal infection from most studies are predictably around 56%, irrespective of the lipid formulation and dose used. Animal models provide evidence that low doses of a lipid formulation are as successful in reducing fungal dissemination and in prolonging survival as higher doses, although concomitant tissue fungal eradication is not as effectively achieved by the lower doses (survival-mycologic eradication dissociation). Kinetic studies performed in the clinically relevant setting of critically ill patients give further support to the use of low doses, since levels of liposomal amphotericin B at all dosages between 1 and 4 mg/kg/day are similar and above maximum inhibitory concentrations for commonly encountered fungi. There has only been one prospective randomised study designed with the primary end-point of comparing two dosages of an amphotericin B lipid formulation on clinical response and survival. That European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study concluded that liposomal amphotericin B given at 1 mg was as efficacious as 4 mg/kg/day in treating neutropenic patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. There are a multitude of unanswered questions concerning dosing, and their answers are confounded by difficulties in performing clinical trials and the multiplicity of factors other than antifungal chemotherapy that influence outcome. Maximum tolerated dose studies using existing lipid formulations, or perhaps with the newer formulations such as pegylated immunoliposomal amphotericin B, could be performed to shed light on this difficult area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11429013     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3062.2000.020203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis        ISSN: 1398-2273            Impact factor:   2.228


  4 in total

1.  Voriconazole, a novel wide-spectrum triazole: oral pharmacokinetics and safety.

Authors:  Lynn Purkins; Nolan Wood; Katie Greenhalgh; Michael J Allen; Stuart D Oliver
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Treatment of invasive candidiasis in immunocompromised pediatric patients.

Authors:  Brian T Fisher; Theoklis E Zaoutis
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Comparative efficacies of four amphotericin B formulations--Fungizone, amphotec (Amphocil), AmBisome, and Abelcet--against systemic murine aspergillosis.

Authors:  Karl V Clemons; David A Stevens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Efficacy of Topical Liposomal Amphotericin B versus Intralesional Meglumine Antimoniate (Glucantime) in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Pouran Layegh; Omid Rajabi; Mahmoud Reza Jafari; Parisa Emamgholi Tabar Malekshah; Toktam Moghiman; Hami Ashraf; Roshanak Salari
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-11-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.