Literature DB >> 11427849

Electrical stimulation for propelling endoscopes.

C A Mosse1, T N Mills, M N Appleyard, S S Kadirkamanathan, C P Swain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methods are needed for propulsion of endoscopes and wireless video capsules along the small intestine. This work aims to test the hypothesis that electrical stimulation could propel an endoscope by stimulating muscular contraction.
METHODS: Prototype acrylic ovoid-shaped devices were constructed with 2 stainless steel electrodes mounted on the tapered section. Five devices 15 to 23 mm diameter with a taper of 28 degrees to 40 degrees (included angle) were tested. When these devices were in contact with the bowel wall, electrostimulation was applied causing circular muscle contraction, which when applied to the taper of the ovoid resulted in forward propulsion of the device. The method does not induce peristalsis but works by stimulating local contraction. The device was tested in the small intestine and esophagus of anesthetized pigs.
RESULTS: Electrostimulation caused the ovoid to advance rapidly (6 mm/sec) up and down the esophagus by inducing circular esophageal muscle contraction. When stimulated at 15 Hz with 30-ms pulses, the threshold for movement in the small intestine was 12 mA; at 20 mA the device moved reliably in either direction in the small intestine at speeds of up to 4.5 mm/sec and negotiated tight curves.
CONCLUSION: Electrostimulation can move endoscopes in the small intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11427849     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.116327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

Review 1.  Wireless capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  P Swain
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place... and how they may be avoided.

Authors:  Arjo J Loeve; Paul Fockens; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Stopping mechanism for capsule endoscope using electrical stimulus.

Authors:  Sang Hyo Woo; Tae Wan Kim; Jin Ho Cho
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Current state of micro-robots/devices as substitutes for screening colonoscopy: assessment based on technology readiness levels.

Authors:  Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Stuart Coleman; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotics in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Dan Cater; Arpita Vyas; Dinesh Vyas
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-06

Review 6.  Frontiers of robotic endoscopic capsules: a review.

Authors:  Gastone Ciuti; R Caliò; D Camboni; L Neri; F Bianchi; A Arezzo; A Koulaouzidis; S Schostek; D Stoyanov; C M Oddo; B Magnani; A Menciassi; M Morino; M O Schurr; P Dario
Journal:  J Microbio Robot       Date:  2016-05-02

7.  A compact targeted drug delivery mechanism for a next generation wireless capsule endoscope.

Authors:  Stephen P Woods; Timothy G Constandinou
Journal:  J Microbio Robot       Date:  2016-05-13

8.  Engineering Micromechanical Systems for the Next Generation Wireless Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Stephen Woods; Timothy Constandinou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Acoustic Sensing and Ultrasonic Drug Delivery in Multimodal Theranostic Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Fraser R Stewart; Yongqiang Qiu; Holly S Lay; Ian P Newton; Benjamin F Cox; Mohammed A Al-Rawhani; James Beeley; Yangminghao Liu; Zhihong Huang; David R S Cumming; Inke Näthke; Sandy Cochran
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.