Literature DB >> 11427271

Three double-blind, randomized trials evaluating the safety and tolerance of different formulations of the saponin adjuvant QS-21.

D C Waite1, E W Jacobson, F A Ennis, R Edelman, B White, R Kammer, C Anderson, C R Kensil.   

Abstract

The effects of the adjuvant QS-21 in various formulations on immediate pain on injection after intramuscular injection were evaluated in three Phase I clinical trials in healthy adults. Each trial was designed as a double-blind, randomized, four-way or five-way cross-over study with each subject acting as his/her own control. In the first trial, four formulations designed to evaluate the effect of QS-21 or pH (over a range of 6--7.2) were evaluated: phosphate-buffered saline at pH 6.0 or 7.2, and 50 microg of QS-21 in phosphate-buffered saline at pH 6.0 or 7.2. Thirty-three volunteers received each of the four intramuscular injections in random order separated by approximately 1 week. The volunteers assessed the immediate injection pain from 0 to 10 (none to most pain). The data indicate that the presence of QS-21, but not pH, is associated with transient injection site pain. The second trial, which utilized the same design as the first trial, evaluated formulations of QS-21 in various excipients. Fifteen volunteers received phosphate-buffered saline, QS-21/PBS, QS-21/aluminum hydroxide, and QS-21/4 mg/ml of polysorbate 80. Polysorbate 80, but not aluminum hydroxide, reduced the mean pain score compared to QS-21/PBS. The third trial evaluated formulations of QS-21 in additional excipients. Fifteen volunteers received aluminum hydroxide (without QS-21), QS-21/PBS, QS-21/0.72% benzyl alcohol, QS-21/30 mg/ml of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin, and QS-21/8-mg/ml of polysorbate 80. Benzyl alcohol, cyclodextrin, and the higher concentration of polysorbate 80 reduced the pain scores associated with QS-21. Hence, QS-21 is associated with injection pain in simple buffer formulations, but it is possible to improve the acceptability of QS-21-containing formulations through reformulation with certain excipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11427271     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00142-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  22 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  Manmohan Singh; Derek T O'Hagan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Adjuvant activity of emulsan, a secreted lipopolysaccharide from acinetobacter calcoaceticus.

Authors:  Bruce Panilaitis; Atul Johri; Walter Blank; David Kaplan; Juliet Fuhrman
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2002-11

Review 3.  Advances in virus-like particle vaccines for filoviruses.

Authors:  Kelly L Warfield; M Javad Aman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Reduced MyD88 dependency of ISCOMATRIX™ adjuvant in a DNA prime-protein boost HIV vaccine.

Authors:  Rachel Buglione-Corbett; Kimberly Pouliot; Robyn Marty-Roix; Wei Li; Kim West; Shixia Wang; Adriana Baz Morelli; Egil Lien; Shan Lu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Induction of humoral immune responses following vaccination with envelope-containing, formaldehyde-treated, thermally inactivated human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Authors:  B Poon; J T Safrit; H McClure; C Kitchen; J F Hsu; V Gudeman; C Petropoulos; T Wrin; I S Y Chen; K Grovit-Ferbas
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Natural and synthetic saponin adjuvant QS-21 for vaccines against cancer.

Authors:  Govind Ragupathi; Jeffrey R Gardner; Philip O Livingston; David Y Gin
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 7.  Plant-derived immuno-adjuvants in vaccines formulation: a promising avenue for improving vaccines efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Authors:  Arbind Kumar; Aashish Sharma; Narendra Vijay Tirpude; Yogendra Padwad; Vipin Hallan; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  The adjuvanticity of an O. volvulus-derived rOv-ASP-1 protein in mice using sequential vaccinations and in non-human primates.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Nancy Tricoche; Lanying Du; Meredith Hunter; Bin Zhan; Gaddam Goud; Elizabeth S Didier; Jing Liu; Lu Lu; Preston A Marx; Shibo Jiang; Sara Lustigman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chitosan nanoparticles act as an adjuvant to promote both Th1 and Th2 immune responses induced by ovalbumin in mice.

Authors:  Zheng-Shun Wen; Ying-Lei Xu; Xiao-Ting Zou; Zi-Rong Xu
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 6.085

Review 10.  Malaria vaccine adjuvants: latest update and challenges in preclinical and clinical research.

Authors:  Elena Mata; Aiala Salvador; Manoli Igartua; Rosa María Hernández; José Luis Pedraz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.