Literature DB >> 11426977

Sigmoid perforation following radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer.

P T Ramirez1, C Levenback, T W Burke, P Eifel, J K Wolf, D M Gershenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe the clinical presentation, evaluation, management, and outcome of patients experiencing sigmoid perforation following radiation therapy for cervical cancer.
METHODS: A database consisting of over 5000 patients with stage IB-IIIB cervix cancer treated between 1963 and 1992 revealed 35 patients with sigmoid perforation. Twenty-seven were diagnosed and managed at one institution, and they form the study group.
RESULTS: The median age at the time of perforation was 50 years, and the median follow-up care was 78 months (range 6-396). The median time from completion of radiotherapy to perforation was 13 months (range 3-98). The mean interval from the first documented complaint to the index admission was 90 days. Nine (33%) of 27 patients were treated with high-dose radiation therapy. The most common complaint was abdominal pain in 25 (93%) patients, nausea occurred in 12 (44%) patients, weight loss in 12 (44%) patients, and vomiting in 10 (37%) patients. The pain was described as mild in 16 (73%) of 22 patients. Only 5 (18.5%) of 27 patients had physical signs of acute peritonitis, 8 (30%) of 27 patients had some form of tenderness, and 11 (41%) of 27 had a benign exam. A total of 20 (74%) patients had an abdominal radiograph, and 12 (44%) patients had a contrast enema for evaluation. Evidence of perforation was present in 5 (25%) of 20 plain abdominal radiographs and 1 (8%) of 12 contrast enemas. Following admission, 17 (63%) patients were observed initially with subsequent surgery after symptoms either failed to resolve or worsened. The median duration under observation was 4 days (range 1-23). Surgery was performed immediately in 8 patients (30%), and 2 (7%) were observed without operation. In these 2 patients, perforation was diagnosed postmortem. Seventeen (68%) of 25 patients had a localized abscess. Three of the patients who underwent immediate exploration and 7 who had surgery after a period of observation died postoperatively (10/25, 40%). Five (55%) of 9 patients in the group who received high-dose radiation therapy died because of sigmoid perforation. When the time frame of presentation was evaluated, we noted that 10 (50%) of 20 patients died between 1960 and 1979 and 1 (14%) of 7 died between 1980 and 1992.
CONCLUSIONS: Sigmoid perforation following pelvic radiation for cervical cancer does not usually present with the typical signs of a ruptured viscus. A high degree of suspicion remains a priority in the care of radiated patients who present with abdominal pain given the atypical presentation of perforation in this group. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11426977     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

1.  Small bowel perforation 17 months after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Jonathan P Faro; Whitney S Graybill; Celestine S Tung; Anuja Jhingran; Pedro T Ramirez; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Case Rep       Date:  2011-11-20

2.  Sigmoid colon perforation after postoperative hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy in a cervical cancer patient.

Authors:  Hakyoung Kim; Won Park; Yoon-La Choi; Jeong-Won Lee
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-08-21

3.  Sigmoid dose using 3D imaging in cervical-cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Caroline L Holloway; Marie-Lynn Racine; Robert A Cormack; Desmond A O'Farrell; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Emergency surgery in patients who have undergone recent radiotherapy is associated with increased complications and mortality: review of 536 patients.

Authors:  Michael C Sullivan; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Survival after intestinal perforation: can it be predicted?

Authors:  Celestine S Tung; Charlotte C Sun; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Larissa A Meyer; Diane C Bodurka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Intestinal perforation in gynecologic oncology: do all patients benefit from surgical management?

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; L Stewart Massad; Shabnam Pourabolghasem; Gongfu Zhou; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; Andrea R Hagemann; Ivy Wilkinson-Ryan; David G Mutch
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Radiation sigmoiditis mimicking sigmoid colon cancer after radiation therapy for cervical cancer: the implications of three-dimensional image-based brachytherapy planning.

Authors:  Hyebin Lee; Seung Jae Huh; Dongryul Oh; Bae Kwon Jeong; Sang Gyu Ju
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.401

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.