Literature DB >> 11426955

Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage ib-iib cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume.

M Trattner1, A H Graf, S Lax, R Forstner, N Dandachi, J Haas, H Pickel, O Reich, A Staudach, R Winter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the importance of tumor volume as a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in surgically treated stage Ib-IIb cervical carcinoma.
METHODS: One hundred thirteen of one hundred sixty-five patients with histopathological stage Ib-IIb cervical carcinoma (44 Ib1, 24 Ib2, 10 IIa, 35 IIb) treated by radical abdominal hysterectomy between 1989 and 1999, for whom tumor volume could be assessed, were included in this study. Of the 113 patients, 90 (79.6%) received postoperative radiotherapy. Measurement of tumor volume was performed on giant histological sections using a semiautomatic image analyzer. The prognostic significance of tumor volume was analyzed and compared with that of various clinicopathological parameters using uni- and multivariate statistics.
RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival was 71.4%. Increasing tumor volume was associated with more frequent lymph node metastases and a significant decrease in OS (P = 0.0112). The Median tumor volume was smaller in stage IIa tumors than in stage Ib2 tumors, and histopathological stage did not correlate linearly with lymph node metastases as well as OS. Stage Ib2 tumors were associated with worse overall survival than stage IIa tumors. In univariate analysis, lymph node metastases, histopathological stage, lymph vascular space involvement, tumor volume, parametrial spread, and tumor involvement of resection margins were significant parameters for OS. In multivariate statistical analysis, only lymph node metastases and histopathological staging remained independent prognostic factors for OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor volume does not seem to confer additional prognostic information if histopathological stage and lymph node status are known. However, it may provide important prognostic information if lymph node status is not known or histopathological stage cannot be assessed. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11426955     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

1.  Survival and prognosticators of node-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Masayoshi Hosaka; Hidemichi Watari; Takashi Mitamura; Yousuke Konno; Tetsuji Odagiri; Tatsuya Kato; Mahito Takeda; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The sentinel node in cervical cancer: scintigraphy and laparoscopic gamma probe-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Rik Pijpers; Marrije R Buist; Arthur van Lingen; Jan Dijkstra; Paul J van Diest; Gerrit J J Teule; Peter Kenemans; René H M Verheijen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Value of pelvic examination and imaging modality for the evaluation of tumor size in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yoo-Kyung Lee; Seung-Su Han; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Early invasive cervical cancer: MRI and CT predictors of lymphatic metastases in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco A Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Mostafa Atri; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Comparison of real-time PCR signal-amplified in situ hybridization and conventional PCR for detection and quantification of human papillomavirus in archival cervical cancer tissue.

Authors:  Karin Biedermann; Nadia Dandachi; Maria Trattner; Georgia Vogl; Hildegard Doppelmayr; Elena Moré; Alfons Staudach; Otto Dietze; Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shengwei Kang; Junxiang Wu; Jie Li; Qing Hou; Bin Tang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Prognostic analysis of uterine cervical cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy: importance of positive or close parametrial resection margin.

Authors:  Yi-Jun Kim; Kyung-Ja Lee; Kyung Ran Park; Jiyoung Kim; Wonguen Jung; Rena Lee; Seung Cheol Kim; Hye Sung Moon; Woong Ju; Yun Hwan Kim; Jihae Lee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  Identification of a microRNA signature associated with survivability in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chengbin Ma; Wenying Zhang; Qiongwei Wu; Yu Liu; Chao Wang; Guoying Lao; Longtao Yang; Ping Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix.

Authors:  Khashayar Rafat Zand; Caroline Reinhold; Hisashi Abe; Sharad Maheshwari; Ahmed Mohamed; Daniel Upegui
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  The Number of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes and Multiple Groups of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis Influence Prognosis in Stage IA-IIB Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Li-Jun Zhao; Ming-Zhu Li; Ming-Xia Li; Jian-Liu Wang; Li-Hui Wei
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.