Literature DB >> 11426899

Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse.

E Leron1, S L Stanton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the ongoing results of sacrohysteropexy with Teflon mesh for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse in women who desire to preserve their uterus.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen consecutive women with uterovaginal prolapse wishing to retain their uterus operated on by one surgeon. SURGICAL
METHOD: Sacrohysteropexy with Teflon mesh attached to the uterine isthmus and to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the first or second sacral vertebra in a tension-free fashion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective and objective cure of uterine prolapse and operative and post-operative complications.
RESULTS: The mean age of the women was 38 years (range 27-60). Eight women were multiparous. Twelve women had second degree uterine prolapse and one woman had third degree of uterine prolapse. Mesh was extended to correct a cystocele in one woman and a rectocele in three women. In four women colposuspension was performed at the same time. There were no intra- and post-operative complications. The mean follow up time was 16 months (range 4-49). At follow up only one woman had a first degree uterine prolapse. A total of seven women (53.8%) reported constipation which had been experienced pre-operatively by four women (30.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: We consider the sacrohysteropexy with Teflon mesh a safe, effective and durable surgical procedure for the management of uterovaginal prolapse in young women and those who desire to retain their uterus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11426899     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00138.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  19 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.

Authors:  Nathan Kow; Howard B Goldman; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ke Pan; Lili Cao; Nicholas A Ryan; Yanzhou Wang; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Variation in the practice of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Dutch survey.

Authors:  Mèlanie N van IJsselmuiden; Manon H Kerkhof; René P Schellart; Marlies Y Bongers; Wilbert A Spaans; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Maria Lee; Bo Wook Kim; Yongil Kwon
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Tommaso Simoncini; Eleonora Russo; Paolo Mannella; Andrea Giannini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Radwan Faraj; Jonathan Broome
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-03

9.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 1- to 4-year follow-up of women postoperatively.

Authors:  Philip Rahmanou; B White; N Price; S Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  A comparison of different pelvic reconstruction surgeries using mesh for pelvic organ prolapse patients.

Authors:  Sang Wook Bai; Euy Hyuk Kim; Jong Seung Shin; Sei Kwang Kim; Ki Hyun Park; Dong Han Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.