J W Brown1, H J Park, M W Turrentine. 1. Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Riley Hospital for Children, and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA. jobrown@iupui.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The arterial switch procedure has become the preferred procedure for the transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and Taussig-Bing anomaly. This analysis is intended to identify potential factors affecting survival in the current era. METHODS: From 1986 to 1999, 201 consecutive patients underwent an arterial switch operation for TGA or Taussig-Bing anomaly. Multivariate analysis of perioperative variables was performed for operative morbidity/ mortality. Patients were separated into two groups. Phase 1 (n = 29) included patients before mid-1989 who underwent an open coronary reimplantation technique. Phase 2 (n = 172) included the patients undergoing a technique of reimplanting coronary buttons after neoaortic reconstruction. RESULTS: The patient population included TGA with intact ventricular septum (58.7%, 118 of 201), with ventricular septal defect (31.3%, 61 of 201), and Taussig-Bing anomaly (10.0%, 22 of 201). Overall, early mortality was 9.5% (19 of 201) and there were five late deaths (2.7%). One-month, 1-year, and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 90.4%, 87.9%, and 87.9%, respectively. Reoperation rate for late pulmonary stenosis was 2.7% (5 of 182). The freedom from reoperation at 3 and 5 years was 97.5% and 93.3%, respectively. In the analysis by time period, the operative mortality declined from 27.6% (8 of 29) to 6.4% (11 of 172) (p = 0.002). Risk factors for operative death were coronary artery patterns (usual vs retropulmonary left coronary artery, p = 0.009) in phase 1 and preoperative instability in phase 2 (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The arterial switch operation for TGA and Taussig-Bing anomaly has early low and late mortality and reoperation rates. Technical modifications in coronary reimplantation have minimized coronary artery pattern-related risks.
BACKGROUND: The arterial switch procedure has become the preferred procedure for the transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and Taussig-Bing anomaly. This analysis is intended to identify potential factors affecting survival in the current era. METHODS: From 1986 to 1999, 201 consecutive patients underwent an arterial switch operation for TGA or Taussig-Bing anomaly. Multivariate analysis of perioperative variables was performed for operative morbidity/ mortality. Patients were separated into two groups. Phase 1 (n = 29) included patients before mid-1989 who underwent an open coronary reimplantation technique. Phase 2 (n = 172) included the patients undergoing a technique of reimplanting coronary buttons after neoaortic reconstruction. RESULTS: The patient population included TGA with intact ventricular septum (58.7%, 118 of 201), with ventricular septal defect (31.3%, 61 of 201), and Taussig-Bing anomaly (10.0%, 22 of 201). Overall, early mortality was 9.5% (19 of 201) and there were five late deaths (2.7%). One-month, 1-year, and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 90.4%, 87.9%, and 87.9%, respectively. Reoperation rate for late pulmonary stenosis was 2.7% (5 of 182). The freedom from reoperation at 3 and 5 years was 97.5% and 93.3%, respectively. In the analysis by time period, the operative mortality declined from 27.6% (8 of 29) to 6.4% (11 of 172) (p = 0.002). Risk factors for operative death were coronary artery patterns (usual vs retropulmonary left coronary artery, p = 0.009) in phase 1 and preoperative instability in phase 2 (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The arterial switch operation for TGA and Taussig-Bing anomaly has early low and late mortality and reoperation rates. Technical modifications in coronary reimplantation have minimized coronary artery pattern-related risks.
Authors: Joseph A Camarda; Susan E Harris; John Hambrook; Michele A Frommelt; James S Tweddell; Peter C Frommelt Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Wilfred B de Koning; Magdalena van Osch-Gevers; A Derk Jan Ten Harkel; Ron T van Domburg; Alma W Spijkerboer; Elisabeth M W J Utens; Ad J J C Bogers; Willem A Helbing Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Byeong Sam Choi; Bo Sang Kwon; Gi Beom Kim; Eun Jung Bae; Chung Il Noh; Jung Yun Choi; Yong Soo Yun; Woong Han Kim; Jeong Ryul Lee; Yong Jin Kim Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Michael L O'Byrne; Andrew C Glatz; Lihai Song; Heather M Griffis; Marisa E Millenson; Matthew J Gillespie; Yoav Dori; Aaron G DeWitt; Christopher E Mascio; Jonathan J Rome Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David N Schidlow; Kathy J Jenkins; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Ulisses A Croti; Do Thi Cam Giang; Rama K Konda; William M Novick; Nestor F Sandoval; Aldo Castañeda Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel J Dibardino; Andrew E Allison; William K Vaughn; E Dean McKenzie; Charles D Fraser Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969