STUDY DESIGN: This is a longitudinal study in which industrial workers without chronic low back pain (LBP) were initially assessed with a comprehensive test battery and surveyed every 6 months thereafter for 2 years. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that may predispose industrial workers who lift over 5000 kg per shift to LBP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective studies are small in number and often limited in breadth or depth of the test battery, methodologic issues, or investigator expertise. There are no prospective studies that focus on a homogeneous work sample of industrial employees. METHODS: Production workers (n = 149) who volunteered for the 2-year study were assessed using physical measures (e.g., muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility), lifting kinematics (a sagittal plane box lift), and health, lifestyle, and work environment data (paper questionnaires). Follow-up questionnaires were distributed every 6 months for 2 years. RESULTS: Using self-report of LBP as the main outcome measure, eight variables predicted LBP in this sample with a 75% correct prediction rate. Predictor variables included age, thoracic acceleration during the trunk velocity test, median frequency intercept of electromyography of the right L3 erector spinae, quadriceps strength, quadriceps endurance, self-assessment of fitness, having a confidante, and number of medications currently taken. CONCLUSION: Results confirmed the multifactorial nature of low back pain and suggest that personal fitness is an important defense against low back pain, even in manual handling lifting tasks.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a longitudinal study in which industrial workers without chronic low back pain (LBP) were initially assessed with a comprehensive test battery and surveyed every 6 months thereafter for 2 years. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that may predispose industrial workers who lift over 5000 kg per shift to LBP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective studies are small in number and often limited in breadth or depth of the test battery, methodologic issues, or investigator expertise. There are no prospective studies that focus on a homogeneous work sample of industrial employees. METHODS: Production workers (n = 149) who volunteered for the 2-year study were assessed using physical measures (e.g., muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility), lifting kinematics (a sagittal plane box lift), and health, lifestyle, and work environment data (paper questionnaires). Follow-up questionnaires were distributed every 6 months for 2 years. RESULTS: Using self-report of LBP as the main outcome measure, eight variables predicted LBP in this sample with a 75% correct prediction rate. Predictor variables included age, thoracic acceleration during the trunk velocity test, median frequency intercept of electromyography of the right L3 erector spinae, quadriceps strength, quadriceps endurance, self-assessment of fitness, having a confidante, and number of medications currently taken. CONCLUSION: Results confirmed the multifactorial nature of low back pain and suggest that personal fitness is an important defense against low back pain, even in manual handling lifting tasks.
Authors: Sven Schneider; Holger Schmitt; Silke Zoller; Marcus Schiltenwolf Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2005-04-12 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: H H Hamberg-van Reenen; G A M Ariëns; B M Blatter; J W R Twisk; W van Mechelen; P M Bongers Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Abbas Heydari; Antoni V F Nargol; Anthony P C Jones; Anthony R Humphrey; Charles G Greenough Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-02-02 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Marie B Jørgensen; Andreas Holtermann; Finn Gyntelberg; Poul Suadicani Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-03-09 Impact factor: 2.362