PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of portal venous stent placement in patients with pancreatic or biliary neoplasms invading portal veins and causing portal hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients underwent portal venous stent placement because of gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8), risk of gastroesophageal varix rupture (n = 4), ascites (n = 4), thrombocytopenia (n = 3), and/or portal venous thrombosis (n = 3). The main portal vein or both the intrahepatic and main portal veins were invaded in six patients (group A). The main portal vein and splanchnic veins were involved in seven patients (group B). Stents were placed across the stenotic (n = 8) or occluded (n = 5) lesions after percutaneous transhepatic portography. Changes in portal venous pressure, stent patency, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean portal venous pressure decreased significantly immediately after stent placement, from 24.9 mm Hg +/- 5.9 (SD) to 15.8 mm Hg +/- 4.6 (P <.001). In group A, blood flow through the stent was maintained and the symptoms had subsided at follow-up (mean, 12.5 months). In group B, symptoms were improved in five patients, but the stents were occluded in all but one patient at a mean follow-up of 1.5 months. There was a significant difference in stent patency between the patients with (14%) and those without (100%) splanchnic venous involvement (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Stent placement helped to relieve portal hypertension symptoms. Splanchnic venous involvement was associated with worse stent patency.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of portal venous stent placement in patients with pancreatic or biliary neoplasms invading portal veins and causing portal hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients underwent portal venous stent placement because of gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8), risk of gastroesophageal varix rupture (n = 4), ascites (n = 4), thrombocytopenia (n = 3), and/or portal venous thrombosis (n = 3). The main portal vein or both the intrahepatic and main portal veins were invaded in six patients (group A). The main portal vein and splanchnic veins were involved in seven patients (group B). Stents were placed across the stenotic (n = 8) or occluded (n = 5) lesions after percutaneous transhepatic portography. Changes in portal venous pressure, stent patency, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean portal venous pressure decreased significantly immediately after stent placement, from 24.9 mm Hg +/- 5.9 (SD) to 15.8 mm Hg +/- 4.6 (P <.001). In group A, blood flow through the stent was maintained and the symptoms had subsided at follow-up (mean, 12.5 months). In group B, symptoms were improved in five patients, but the stents were occluded in all but one patient at a mean follow-up of 1.5 months. There was a significant difference in stent patency between the patients with (14%) and those without (100%) splanchnic venous involvement (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Stent placement helped to relieve portal hypertension symptoms. Splanchnic venous involvement was associated with worse stent patency.
Authors: Kyung Hee Woo; Jin Bae Kim; Yoon Jung Chang; Hyo Jung Kim; Il Hyun Baek; Jin Seok Ko; Ji Young Woo; Hong Dae Kim; Myung Seok Lee Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: Rahul A Sheth; Sharjeel H Sabir; Philip Parmet; Roshon Amin; Joshua D Kuban; Steven Y Huang; Armeen Mahvash; David Fogelman; Milind Javle; Michael J Wallace Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-12-28