Literature DB >> 11425457

Genetic abnormalities specifically associated with varying metastatic potential of prostate cancer cell lines as detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

L W Chu1, C A Pettaway, J C Liang.   

Abstract

Established recently are two in vivo prostate tumor progression models in which subclones of the PC3M and LNCaP cell lines were selected for varying growth characteristics and metastatic potential after successive orthotopic implantation in the prostate of nude mice. In this study, we used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to compare the chromosomal abnormalities between the parental cell lines and their respective variants and to determine if specific chromosomal abnormalities can be identified that are associated with different growth properties. PC3M and its derivative cell lines PC3M-Pro4 and PC3M-LN4 shared gains of 8q22--qter, 10q21--q22, and Xq27--qter and loss of 13q33--qter. PC3M-Pro4, a derivative line that produced significantly larger tumors in the prostate, had a unique gain of 3q13. In contrast, PC3M-LN4, the derivative line that produced significantly larger metastatic tumors in the lymph nodes and had higher incidences of distant metastases, had a specific gain of 1q21--q22 and losses of 10q23--qter and 18q12--q21. In the second in vivo model, LNCaP and its derivative cell lines shared gain of 3q27--qter and loss on 13q21--qter. The derivative line that produced significantly larger tumors in the prostate, LNCaP-Pro5, had a unique gain on 13q12--q13. In comparison, LNCaP-LN3, a derivative line that had a significantly higher incidence of lymph node metastases and produced significantly larger metastatic tumors in the lymph nodes, had specific losses of 16q23--qter and 21q. Interestingly, some regions of loss (e.g., 10q23-->qter, 16q23-->qter, and 18q12-->q21) detected in the variant cell lines correlated well with abnormalities seen in clinical prostate cancer cases. Thus, our data suggest not only that these cell lines are relevant in vivo models for prostate cancer progression, but also that CGH is a valuable tool for uncovering chromosomal regions that are important for aggressive growth and metastasis of prostate cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425457     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(01)00389-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  5 in total

1.  The abnormalities of chromosome 8 in two hepatocellular carcinoma cell clones with the same genetic background and different metastatic potential.

Authors:  Jiong Yang; Lun-Xiu Qin; Sheng-Long Ye; Yin-Kun Liu; Yan Li; Dong-Mei Gao; Jie Chen; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Expression of Na+-dependent citrate transport in a strongly metastatic human prostate cancer PC-3M cell line: regulation by voltage-gated Na+ channel activity.

Authors:  Maria E Mycielska; Christopher P Palmer; William J Brackenbury; Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Chromosomal aberrations related to metastasis of human solid tumors.

Authors:  Lun-Xiu Qin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  KPT-330, a potent and selective exportin-1 (XPO-1) inhibitor, shows antitumor effects modulating the expression of cyclin D1 and survivin [corrected] in prostate cancer models.

Authors:  Giovanni Luca Gravina; Andrea Mancini; Patrizia Sanita; Flora Vitale; Francesco Marampon; Luca Ventura; Yosef Landesman; Dilara McCauley; Michael Kauffman; Sharon Shacham; Claudio Festuccia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  A novel RNA aptamer identifies plasma membrane ATP synthase beta subunit as an early marker and therapeutic target in aggressive cancer.

Authors:  S Speransky; P Serafini; J Caroli; S Bicciato; M E Lippman; N H Bishopric
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.