Literature DB >> 11425216

Towards global analysis of mammalian proteomes using sample prefractionation prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels and using one-dimensional gels for insoluble and large proteins.

X Zuo1, L Echan, P Hembach, H Y Tang, K D Speicher, D Santoli, D W Speicher.   

Abstract

The number of unique protein species in proteomes from a single mammalian cell type is not well defined but is likely to be at least 10000-20000. Since standard-size two-dimensional gels typically resolve only about 1500 to 3000 spots, they merely analyze a small portion of these proteomes. In addition, all insoluble proteins and typically proteins > 100 kDa are seldom resolved on two-dimensional (2-D) gels. The current study demonstrates the feasibility of an overall strategy for more comprehensive quantitative comparisons of complex proteomes derived from physiological fluids or mammalian cell extracts. A key feature of this approach is to prefractionate samples into a few well-resolved fractions based on the proteins' isoelectric points (pIs) using microscale solution isoelectric focusing. These fractions are then separated on narrow pH range two-dimensional gels approximately +/- 0.1 pH unit wider than the prefractionated pool. When this prefractionation approach is applied to complex mammalian proteomes, it improves resolution and spot recovery at high protein loads compared with use of parallel narrow pH range gels without prefractionation. The minimal cross-contamination between fractions allows quantitative comparisons in contrast to most alternative prefractionation methods. In addition, complementary data can be obtained by parallel analysis of the solubilized fraction on high-resolution large-pore-gradient one-dimensional gels followed by mass spectrometric identification to analyze proteins between 100 and approximately 500 kDa. Similarly, insoluble proteins can be analyzed using large-pore gels for large proteins and 10-12% one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gels for smaller proteins. Together, these strategies should permit more reliable quantitative comparisons of complex mammalian proteomes where detection of at least 10000 protein spots is needed in order to analyze the majority of the unique protein species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425216     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200105)22:9<1603::AID-ELPS1603>3.0.CO;2-I

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  24 in total

Review 1.  Current perspectives in cancer proteomics.

Authors:  Miriam V Dwek; Sarah L Rawlings
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Using size exclusion chromatography-RPLC and RPLC-CIEF as two-dimensional separation strategies for protein profiling.

Authors:  David C Simpson; Seonghee Ahn; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Bogdan Bogdanov; Heather M Mottaz; Andrey N Vilkov; Gordon A Anderson; Mary S Lipton; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Inhibition of Ku70 acetylation by INHAT subunit SET/TAF-Iβ regulates Ku70-mediated DNA damage response.

Authors:  Kee-Beom Kim; Dong-Wook Kim; Jin Woo Park; Young-Joo Jeon; Daehwan Kim; Sangmyung Rhee; Jung-Il Chae; Sang-Beom Seo
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Sample complexity reduction for two-dimensional electrophoresis using solution isoelectric focusing prefractionation.

Authors:  Matthew R Richardson; Sean Liu; Heather N Ringham; Victor Chan; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  A xenograft mouse model coupled with in-depth plasma proteome analysis facilitates identification of novel serum biomarkers for human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hsin-Yao Tang; Lynn A Beer; Tony Chang-Wong; Rachel Hammond; Phyllis Gimotty; George Coukos; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  A systems biology analysis of metastatic melanoma using in-depth three-dimensional protein profiling.

Authors:  Mee-Jung Han; Huan Wang; Lynn A Beer; Hsin-Yao Tang; Meenhard Herlyn; David W Speicher
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  In-depth analysis of a plasma or serum proteome using a 4D protein profiling method.

Authors:  Hsin-Yao Tang; Lynn A Beer; David W Speicher
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

8.  Phenotyping breast cancer cell lines EM-G3, HCC1937, MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 using 2-D electrophoresis and affinity chromatography for glutathione-binding proteins.

Authors:  Jana Mladkova; Miloslav Sanda; Eva Matouskova; Irena Selicharova
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Microfluidic preparative free-flow isoelectric focusing: system optimization for protein complex separation.

Authors:  Jian Wen; Erik W Wilker; Michael B Yaffe; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Comparison of extensive protein fractionation and repetitive LC-MS/MS analyses on depth of analysis for complex proteomes.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Tony Chang-Wong; Hsin-Yao Tang; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.