Literature DB >> 11425132

Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure.

H Müsch1, S Buus.   

Abstract

This article introduces a new model that predicts speech intelligibility based on statistical decision theory. This model, which we call the speech recognition sensitivity (SRS) model, aims to predict speech-recognition performance from the long-term average speech spectrum, the masking excitation in the listener's ear, the linguistic entropy of the speech material, and the number of response alternatives available to the listener. A major difference between the SRS model and other models with similar aims, such as the articulation index, is this model's ability to account for synergetic and redundant interactions among spectral bands of speech. In the SRS model, linguistic entropy affects intelligibility by modifying the listener's identification sensitivity to the speech. The effect of the number of response alternatives on the test score is a direct consequence of the model structure. The SRS model also appears to predict the differential effect of linguistic entropy on filter condition and the interaction between linguistic entropy, signal-to-noise ratio, and language proficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425132     DOI: 10.1121/1.1371971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  The redundancy of phonemes in sentential context.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Analysis of a simplified normalized covariance measure based on binary weighting functions for predicting the intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Intelligibilities of 1-octave rectangular bands spanning the speech spectrum when heard separately and paired.

Authors:  Richard M Warren; James A Bashford; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

5.  Comparing models of the combined-stimulation advantage for speech recognition.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Ted A Meyer; Adam R Kaiser; Su Wooi Teoh; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Is intelligibility of adjacent passbands hypoadditive or hyperadditive?

Authors:  Richard M Warren; James A Bashford; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2009-07

10.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.