Literature DB >> 11423917

Seeing mum drinking a 'light' product: is social learning a stronger determinant of taste preference acquisition than caloric conditioning?

A Jansen1, N Tenney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It was examined whether caloric conditioning or social learning strategies dominate in taste preference acquisition in children. The caloric learning paradigm predicts that eating or drinking artificially sweetened products, which deliver virtually no energy, will not lead to a taste preference whereas the social learning paradigm predicts that seeing important others modelling the eating and drinking of these 'light' products will induce a preference for the taste of light products in the child.
DESIGN: In a 2 x 2 between subjects factorial design, the amount of energy and social modelling was varied.
SETTING: The study was undertaken at primary schools in Maastricht, The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: Forty-five children participated and six children dropped out. The 39 children who completed the study (14 boys and 25 girls) had a mean age of 67 months (range 51--81, s.d. 5.6).
INTERVENTIONS: Each subject took part in nine conditioning trials with an individually selected tasting yoghurt which was not preferred very much at the pre-test.
RESULTS: The children in the combined caloric and social condition showed an increase in their preference for the conditioned taste which was larger than a regression-to-the-mean effect (P=0.007), whereas children in the other groups did not.
CONCLUSION: Caloric and social learning combined, ie modelling the consumption of energy-rich foods or drinks, is the best way to establish taste preferences. Children more easily learn a preference for energy-rich food that is eaten by significant others than for food that is low in energy and eaten by significant others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11423917     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Development of the Parental Modelling of Eating Behaviours Scale (PARM): links with food intake among children and their mothers.

Authors:  Zoe Palfreyman; Emma Haycraft; Caroline Meyer
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Caregiver Influences on Eating Behaviors in Young Children: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alexis C Wood; Jacqueline M Blissett; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Susan Carnell; Myles S Faith; Jennifer O Fisher; Laura L Hayman; Amrik Singh Khalsa; Sheryl O Hughes; Alison L Miller; Shabnam R Momin; Jean A Welsh; Jessica G Woo; Emma Haycraft
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Preference for fruits and vegetables is linked to plate waste among preschool children.

Authors:  Carmen Byker Shanks; Allison Milodragovich; Erin Smith; Betty Izumi; Lacy Stephens; Selena Ahmed
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-08-27

4.  Does parenting affect children's eating and weight status?

Authors:  Alison K Ventura; Leann L Birch
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Perceived effective and feasible strategies to promote healthy eating in young children: focus groups with parents, family child care providers and daycare assistants.

Authors:  Laura Vandeweghe; Ellen Moens; Caroline Braet; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Leentje Vervoort; Sandra Verbeken
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.