Literature DB >> 11423809

Defining radiographic criteria for flexion-extension studies of the cervical spine.

R Knopp1, J Parker, J Tashjian, W Ganz.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe and measure 3 radiographic variables in normal male volunteers and determine whether these variables could be useful in establishing more objective radiographic criteria for evaluation of flexion-extension studies of the cervical spine. In addition, we hypothesized that patients with a normal cervical spine should not have greater than 2 mm of subluxation present with flexion or extension.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study of normal male volunteers between the ages of 18 and 40 years was performed. We obtained radiographs of all participants in neutral, flexion, and extension positions and measured the amount of subluxation and interspinous distance, as well as the degree of vertebral angulation between C3 and C7.
RESULTS: One hundred male volunteers were included in the study. Subluxation during flexion (compared with neutral) was greater than 2 mm in none of the participants at each level from C3 to C7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 3.6); subluxation in extension was greater than 2 mm in one participant at one level from C3 to C4 (95% CI 0 to 5.5) and none of the participants at each of the remaining 3 levels from C4 to C7 (95% CI 0 to 3.6). Comparing flexion with the neutral position, the mean vertebral angulation and SD were 24.2 degrees and 13.3 degrees, and the 95% certainty interval (CEI) was -1.9 to 50.2. Comparing extension with the neutral position, the mean vertebral angulation was 14.1 degrees, with an SD of 13.3 degrees, and the 95% CEI was -4.6 to 32.8. The mean change in interspinous distance between the neutral position and flexion varied from 1.2 to 4.6 mm (SD 1.7 to 2.4 mm), depending on the level of cervical spine studied. When comparing the neutral position and extension, the mean change in interspinous distance varied from 1.2 to 2.2 mm (SD 1.7 to 1.9).
CONCLUSION: Currently, there are no clinically validated criteria for evaluating flexion-extension studies of the cervical spine. Our study suggests that subluxation greater than 2 mm in men 18 to 40 years of age may be a useful variable for further study as an indicator of ligamentous injury. Interspinous distance and vertebral angulation appear less likely to have useful clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11423809     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.114319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  8 in total

1.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  [Evidence based diagnostic procedures for the determination of suspected blunt cervical spine injuries. Development of an algorithm].

Authors:  B A Leidel; K-G Kanz; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Observer agreement in assessing flexion-extension X-rays of the cervical spine, with and without the use of quantitative measurements of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  Mehul Taylor; John A Hipp; Stanley D Gertzbein; Shankar Gopinath; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients.

Authors:  Bonnie McCracken; Eric Klineberg; Brian Pickard; David H Wisner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A delayed diagnosis of bilateral facet dislocation of the cervical spine: a case report.

Authors:  Julie O'Shaughnessy; Julie-Marthe Grenier; Paula J Stern
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-03

7.  Rationale and design of the INNOVATE Trial: an international cooperative study on surgical versus conservative treatment for odontoid fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Jeroen G J Huybregts; Wilco C H Jacobs; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of measures of cervical sagittal rotation.

Authors:  Sheng-Dan Jiang; Jiang-Wei Chen; Yue-Hua Yang; Xiao-Dong Chen; Lei-Sheng Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.