Relative potencies of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) and 19-Nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) on inducing differentiation and markers of bone formation in MG-63 cells.

19-Nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2), an analog of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3), is used to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism because it suppresses parathyroid hormone synthesis and secretion with lower calcemic and phosphatemic activities. 19-Nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) is approximately 10 times less active than 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) in promoting bone resorption, which accounts in part for the low potency of this analog in increasing serum calcium and phosphorus. Concern that 19-nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) also could be less potent than 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) on bone formation led to a comparison of the potency of both compounds on osteoblasts. In the human osteoblast-like cell line MG-63, 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) and 19-nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) had a similar potency in upregulating vitamin D receptor content and suppressing proliferation. Both sterols caused a similar reduction in DNA content and proliferating cell nuclear antigen protein expression. Time-course and dose-response studies on 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) and 19-nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) induction of the marker of bone formation, osteocalcin, showed overlapping curves. The effects on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity also were studied in MG-63 cells that had been co-treated with either sterol and transforming growth factor-beta, an enhancer of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3)-induced ALP activity in this cell line. Transforming growth factor-beta alone had no effect, whereas 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) and 19-nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) increased ALP activity similarly. These studies demonstrate that 19-nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) has the same potency as 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) not only in inducing vitamin D receptor content, osteocalcin levels, and ALP activity but also in controlling osteoblastic growth. Therefore, it is unlikely that 19-nor-1,25-(OH)(2)D(2) would have deleterious effects on bone remodeling.