Literature DB >> 11423284

Does the completeness of revascularization affect early survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients?

B R Osswald1, E H Blackstone, U Tochtermann, P Schweiger, G Thomas, C F Vahl, S Hagl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Usefulness and risks of incomplete versus complete revascularization are still matters of ongoing discussions. Because an increasing number of elderly patients are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the question arises whether a less extensive surgical approach is more prudent than complete revascularization.
METHODS: Of 6531 patients undergoing isolated CABG, 859 were 75 and older at the time of operation. Mean age of the 859 patients was 77+/-2.7 years (median: 76 years); 65% were men. Follow-up enquiry by questionnaire was performed at the 180th postoperative day with a completeness of 95.6%. Assessment of the impact of incomplete revascularization utilized both multivariable analysis and propensity score matching to account for selection factors.
RESULTS: Incomplete revascularization was performed in 133 patients (16%). The most common reasons for incomplete revascularization were small vessels (55%) and massive calcification (32%). Mortality until 180 days after CABG was higher (n=32; 24%) after incomplete than after complete revascularization (n=105; 15%; P=0.005). By logistic multivariable regression, incomplete revascularization was identified as an independent risk factor for death (Odds ratio, 1.8; P=0.015). By time-related analysis, incomplete revascularization predominantly affected the early period after CABG (P=0.001). Aortic cross clamping time was only slightly shorter for the group with incomplete (59+/-27 min (median: 55 min) vs. 63+/-26 min (median: 58 min); P=0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete revascularization increases the early risk of death after CABG in patients aged 75 years and older. The potential compensating benefit of the shorter aortic cross clamping time does not outweigh the advantages of complete revascularization. Thus, in the era of high-volume interventional approaches and minimally invasive techniques, the advantages of complete revascularization need to be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11423284     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00743-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Incomplete revascularization in beating heart surgery.

Authors:  Camille L Hancock Friesen; John A Sullivan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Transmyocardial laser revascularization.

Authors:  Keith A Horvath
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 4.  [Minimally invasive heart and mitral valve surgery].

Authors:  Markus Kamler; Daniel Wendt; Unsal Pul; Matthias Thielmann; Thomas Buck; Eva Kottenberg; Raimund Erbel; Heinz Jakob
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR): current status and future directions.

Authors:  Keith B Allen; Amy Mahoney; Sanjeev Aggarwal; John Russell Davis; Eric Thompson; Alex F Pak; Jessica Heimes; A Michael Borkon
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-10-08

Review 6.  Calcium Modification Therapies in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Mohammad Zaidan; Mohammad Alkhalil; Khaldoon Alaswad
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

7.  Right-sided reverse T composite arterial grafting to complete revascularization of the right coronary artery.

Authors:  Mathias H Aazami; Mohammad Abbasi-Teshnizi; Shahram Amini; Nasim Sadat Lotfinejad
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Transmyocardial revascularization devices: technology update.

Authors:  Bogdan A Kindzelski; Yifu Zhou; Keith A Horvath
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-18

9.  Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India.

Authors:  Bhanu Duggal; Jyothi Subramanian; Mona Duggal; Pushpendra Singh; Meeta Rajivlochan; Sujata Saunik; Koundinya Desiraju; Archana Avhad; Usha Ram; Sayan Sen; Anurag Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detection of gender differences in incomplete revascularization after coronary artery bypass surgery varies with classification technique.

Authors:  Sabine Oertelt-Prigione; Friederike Kendel; Martin Kaltenbach; Roland Hetzer; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Rufus Baretti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.