T Axelsson1, P A Jansson, U Smith, B Eliasson. 1. Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine if an acute nicotine infusion alters insulin sensitivity to a similar degree in type 2 diabetic patients as in healthy control subjects. DESIGN: . Double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled, randomized experimental study. Nicotine 0.3 microg kg-1 min(-1) or NaCl was infused (2 h) during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (4 h) to assess insulin sensitivity. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS:Six male and female type 2 diabetic patients [DM2; age 54 +/- 10 (mean +/- SD) years; body mass index (BMI) 25.6 +/- 2.9 kg m(-2)] treated with diet or one oral hypoglycaemic agent and six age- and BMI-matched control subjects (Ctr). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Insulin sensitivity (rate of glucose infusion per kg fat free body mass and minute), nicotine and free fatty acid (FFA) levels, pulse rate and blood pressure. RESULTS: The infusions produced similar nicotine levels in both groups. In the absence of nicotine, DM2 were more insulin resistant than Ctr (6.7 +/- 0.4 vs. 10.9 +/- 0.3 mg kg-1 LBM min(-1), respectively; P < 0.0001). This insulin resistance was further aggravated by the nicotine infusion in DM2 but not in Ctr (4.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 10.9 +/- 0.3 mg kg(-1) LBM min(-1); P < 0.0001). Only minor differences were seen in FFA levels, pulse rates and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: At this low infusion rate, nicotine aggravated the insulin resistance in DM2 but not in Ctr. This finding may be because of the (dysmetabolic) diabetic state per se or to an increased sensitivity to environmental factors associated with a genetic predisposition for type 2 diabetes. These results show that diabetic subjects are particularly susceptible to the detrimental effects of nicotine.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine if an acute nicotine infusion alters insulin sensitivity to a similar degree in type 2 diabeticpatients as in healthy control subjects. DESIGN: . Double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled, randomized experimental study. Nicotine 0.3 microg kg-1 min(-1) or NaCl was infused (2 h) during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (4 h) to assess insulin sensitivity. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Six male and female type 2 diabeticpatients [DM2; age 54 +/- 10 (mean +/- SD) years; body mass index (BMI) 25.6 +/- 2.9 kg m(-2)] treated with diet or one oral hypoglycaemic agent and six age- and BMI-matched control subjects (Ctr). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Insulin sensitivity (rate of glucose infusion per kg fat free body mass and minute), nicotine and free fatty acid (FFA) levels, pulse rate and blood pressure. RESULTS: The infusions produced similar nicotine levels in both groups. In the absence of nicotine, DM2 were more insulin resistant than Ctr (6.7 +/- 0.4 vs. 10.9 +/- 0.3 mg kg-1 LBM min(-1), respectively; P < 0.0001). This insulin resistance was further aggravated by the nicotine infusion in DM2 but not in Ctr (4.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 10.9 +/- 0.3 mg kg(-1) LBM min(-1); P < 0.0001). Only minor differences were seen in FFA levels, pulse rates and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: At this low infusion rate, nicotine aggravated the insulin resistance in DM2 but not in Ctr. This finding may be because of the (dysmetabolic) diabetic state per se or to an increased sensitivity to environmental factors associated with a genetic predisposition for type 2 diabetes. These results show that diabetic subjects are particularly susceptible to the detrimental effects of nicotine.
Authors: Ashley L Merianos; Md Monir Hossain; Jane C Khoury; Georg E Matt; E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Daniel J Conklin; Suzaynn Schick; Michael J Blaha; Alex Carll; Andrew DeFilippis; Peter Ganz; Michael E Hall; Naomi Hamburg; Tim O'Toole; Lindsay Reynolds; Sanjay Srivastava; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alan X Pan; Amparo de la Peña; Kwee P Yeo; Clark Chan; Mei T Loh; Stephen D Wise; Bernard L Silverman; Douglas B Muchmore Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-10-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Sylvia H Ley; Robert A Hegele; Stewart B Harris; Mary Mamakeesick; Henian Cao; Philip W Connelly; Joel Gittelsohn; Ravi Retnakaran; Bernard Zinman; Anthony J Hanley Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Bryan C Bergman; Leigh Perreault; Devon M Hunerdosse; Mary C Koehler; Ali M Samek; Robert H Eckel Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Bryan C Bergman; Leigh Perreault; Devon Hunerdosse; Anna Kerege; Mary Playdon; Ali M Samek; Robert H Eckel Journal: Diabetes Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 9.461