OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and variability of antibiotic use in facilities which provide chronic care and to determine how often clinical criteria for infection are met when antibiotics are prescribed in these facilities. DESIGN: A prospective, 12-month, observational cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-two facilities which provide chronic care in southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were treated with systemic antibiotics over the study period. MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics of antibiotic prescriptions (name, dose, duration, and indication) and clinical features of randomly selected patients who were treated with antibiotics. RESULTS: A total of 9,373 courses of antibiotics were prescribed for 2,408 patients (66% of all patients in study facilities). The incidence of antibiotic prescriptions in the facilities ranged from 2.9 to 13.9 antibiotic courses per 1,000 patient-days. Thirty-six percent of antibiotics were prescribed for respiratory tract infections, 33% for urinary infections, and 13% for skin and soft tissue infections. Standardized surveillance definitions of infection were met in 49% of the 1,602 randomly selected patients who were prescribed antibiotics. Diagnostic criteria for respiratory, urinary, and skin infection were met in 58%, 28%, and 65% of prescriptions, respectively. One third of antibiotic prescriptions for a urinary indication were for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Adverse reactions were noted in 6% of prescriptions for respiratory and urinary infections and 4% of prescriptions for skin infection. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use is frequent and highly variable amongst patients who receive chronic care. Reducing antibiotic prescriptions for asymptomatic bacteriuria represents an important way to optimize antibiotic use in this population.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and variability of antibiotic use in facilities which provide chronic care and to determine how often clinical criteria for infection are met when antibiotics are prescribed in these facilities. DESIGN: A prospective, 12-month, observational cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-two facilities which provide chronic care in southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were treated with systemic antibiotics over the study period. MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics of antibiotic prescriptions (name, dose, duration, and indication) and clinical features of randomly selected patients who were treated with antibiotics. RESULTS: A total of 9,373 courses of antibiotics were prescribed for 2,408 patients (66% of all patients in study facilities). The incidence of antibiotic prescriptions in the facilities ranged from 2.9 to 13.9 antibiotic courses per 1,000 patient-days. Thirty-six percent of antibiotics were prescribed for respiratory tract infections, 33% for urinary infections, and 13% for skin and soft tissue infections. Standardized surveillance definitions of infection were met in 49% of the 1,602 randomly selected patients who were prescribed antibiotics. Diagnostic criteria for respiratory, urinary, and skin infection were met in 58%, 28%, and 65% of prescriptions, respectively. One third of antibiotic prescriptions for a urinary indication were for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Adverse reactions were noted in 6% of prescriptions for respiratory and urinary infections and 4% of prescriptions for skin infection. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use is frequent and highly variable amongst patients who receive chronic care. Reducing antibiotic prescriptions for asymptomatic bacteriuria represents an important way to optimize antibiotic use in this population.
Authors: L B Rice; S H Willey; G A Papanicolaou; A A Medeiros; G M Eliopoulos; R C Moellering; G A Jacoby Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: A McGeer; B Campbell; T G Emori; W J Hierholzer; M M Jackson; L E Nicolle; C Peppler; A Rivera; D G Schollenberger; A E Simor Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Elisabeth Broex; Boudewijn Catry; Katrien Latour; Karl Mertens; Vanessa Vankerckhoven; Arno Muller; Rudi Stroobants; Peter Zarb; Herman Goossens; Béatrice Jans Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Mark Loeb; Kevin Brazil; Lynne Lohfeld; Allison McGeer; Andrew Simor; Kurt Stevenson; Dick Zoutman; Stephanie Smith; Xiwu Liu; Stephen D Walter Journal: BMJ Date: 2005-09-08
Authors: Tessa van der Maaden; Simone A Hendriks; Henrica C W de Vet; Menno T Zomerhuis; Martin Smalbrugge; Elise P Jansma; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Cees M P M Hertogh; Jenny T van der Steen Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Janine R Hutson; Hadas D Fischer; Xuesong Wang; Andrea Gruneir; Nick Daneman; Sudeep S Gill; Paula A Rochon; Geoffrey M Anderson Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Alyssa B Dufour; Michele L Shaffer; Erika M C D'Agata; Daniel Habtemariam; Susan L Mitchell Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: M T Murray; C L Johnson; B Cohen; O Jackson; L K Jones; L Saiman; E L Larson; N Neu Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Vincent Quagliarello; Eleanor Perrelli; Virginia Towle; Peter H Van Ness; Mary Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.562