BACKGROUND AND AIM: A proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin (A) and clarithromycin (C) or metronidazole (M) provides an eradication rate ranging from 80 to 90%. However, there have been few controlled studies with regard to the most effective regimen to re-treat patients after failure of the first-line therapy. Accordingly, we retrospectively reviewed our experiences and compared regimens with different combinations of antimicrobials to determine the optimal retreatment regimen. METHODS: Out of 133 patients who had received second-line therapy after failure of first-line PPI/AC therapy, we selected, for review, patients who took the prescribed drugs for first-line therapy equal to, or more than 80%. As a result, data on 114 patients (83 males and 31 females; mean age 49.1 +/- 13.0 years; peptic ulcer n = 89; non-ulcer dyspepsia, n = 25) were eligible for evaluation. They had either repeated the PPI/AC regimen (n = 34; 5-14 days), or had been administered the PPI/AM regimen (n = 80; 10 days). The cure rates of the two regimens were compared. RESULTS: The eradication rates for second-line therapy with the PPI/AC regimen versus the PPI/AM regimen were 52.9% (95% CI, 35-70) versus 81.3% (95% CI, 71-89) by intention-to-treat analysis (P < 0.01), and 62.1% (95% CI, 42-79) versus 91.4% (95% CI, 81-97) by per-protocol analysis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the PPI/AM retreatment regimen was significantly higher than for the repeated PPI/AC regimen, suggesting that a 10-day PPI/AM regimen can be recommended as a retreatment regimen for patients who had first-line eradication therapy by PPI/AC regimens.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: A proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin (A) and clarithromycin (C) or metronidazole (M) provides an eradication rate ranging from 80 to 90%. However, there have been few controlled studies with regard to the most effective regimen to re-treat patients after failure of the first-line therapy. Accordingly, we retrospectively reviewed our experiences and compared regimens with different combinations of antimicrobials to determine the optimal retreatment regimen. METHODS: Out of 133 patients who had received second-line therapy after failure of first-line PPI/AC therapy, we selected, for review, patients who took the prescribed drugs for first-line therapy equal to, or more than 80%. As a result, data on 114 patients (83 males and 31 females; mean age 49.1 +/- 13.0 years; peptic ulcer n = 89; non-ulcer dyspepsia, n = 25) were eligible for evaluation. They had either repeated the PPI/AC regimen (n = 34; 5-14 days), or had been administered the PPI/AM regimen (n = 80; 10 days). The cure rates of the two regimens were compared. RESULTS: The eradication rates for second-line therapy with the PPI/AC regimen versus the PPI/AM regimen were 52.9% (95% CI, 35-70) versus 81.3% (95% CI, 71-89) by intention-to-treat analysis (P < 0.01), and 62.1% (95% CI, 42-79) versus 91.4% (95% CI, 81-97) by per-protocol analysis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the PPI/AM retreatment regimen was significantly higher than for the repeated PPI/AC regimen, suggesting that a 10-day PPI/AM regimen can be recommended as a retreatment regimen for patients who had first-line eradication therapy by PPI/AC regimens.